IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fsesxx/v26y2021i3p303-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are All Populist Voters the Same? Institutional Distrust and the Five Star Movement in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Angelucci
  • Davide Vittori

Abstract

Are all populist voters the same? We focus on a valence populist party case (Five Star Movement) to answer this question. We inquire whether faithful populist voters, new populist voters, populist defectors and non-populist voters all have the same level of institutional trust. Our focus is on the Italian political system, regarded as a promised land for populism. This paradigmatic case sheds light on whether the entrance of a populist party into the system works as a corrective to democracy, as populist voters find their voice represented in parliament, potentially increasing their trust in the institutions. Our main finding is that faithful populist voters are the most distrustful category – meaning that having parliamentary representatives is not enough for populist voters to gain trust in institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Angelucci & Davide Vittori, 2021. "Are All Populist Voters the Same? Institutional Distrust and the Five Star Movement in Italy," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 303-327, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fsesxx:v:26:y:2021:i:3:p:303-327
    DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2022.2028503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13608746.2022.2028503
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13608746.2022.2028503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fsesxx:v:26:y:2021:i:3:p:303-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/fses .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.