IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v44y2018i1p105-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Soukopová
  • Gabriela Vaceková

Abstract

This paper focuses on the internal aspects of intermunicipal cooperation, providing a new and innovative approach to the cost effectiveness of municipal waste management. We examine a sample of 658 municipalities in the Czech Republic’s South Moravian Region and 205 cooperating municipalities separately during 2012–2014. The results, based on ordinary least-squares regression, show that cost reduction is significantly influenced by the institutional arrangement of intermunicipal cooperation, the participation of municipal representatives in management, and professional managers. The paper shows that a crucial role in cost reduction is played by internal factors that have been investigated only marginally so far. Cost increases are related to municipality sizes larger than 10,000 inhabitants and to profit-oriented behaviours of waste collection companies. The results differ in the size samples of municipalities; only the impact of institutional arrangement is significant in all groups of municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Soukopová & Gabriela Vaceková, 2018. "Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 105-126, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:44:y:2018:i:1:p:105-126
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bakoš Eduard & Hrůza Filip & Fiedor David & Klemešová Kamila Dolák, 2021. "The perception of inter-municipal cooperation by local officials and managers," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Ki Eun Kang & Kyungha Lee, 2023. "Collaboration and Public Participation for Municipal Growth in Land Economic Development Projects," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(2), pages 170-182, May.
    3. Hiroki Baba & Yasushi Asami, 2020. "Estimating the minimal efficient scale and the effect of intermunicipal cooperation on service provision areas for waste treatment in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 139-158, February.
    4. Petr Klusáček & Petr Dvořák & Jakub Trojan, 2023. "Revitalising Rural Spaces: Lessons Learnt from Brownfield Regeneration in a Shrinking Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Katarína Melichová & Lukáš Varecha, 2020. "Endogenous Political, Institutional, Cultural, and Geographic Determinants of Intermunicipal Cooperation—Evidence from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Agiamoh Rosaline Georgevna, 2021. "Inter-Regional Cooperation in Waste Management: New Trends in Moscow and the Moscow Region," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 9-39, December.
    7. Julio C. Zambrano-Gutiérrez & Claudia N. Avellaneda, 2023. "Inter-municipal vs. Inter-governmental Cooperation: Their Impact on International Aid," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 861-881, September.
    8. Bart Voorn & Marieke van Genugten & Sandra Van Thiel, 2020. "Performance of municipally owned corporations: Determinants and mechanisms," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 191-212, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:44:y:2018:i:1:p:105-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.