Author
Listed:
- Petter NÆss
- Inger-Lise Saglie
Abstract
Planning research-understood as research aiming to improve the body of knowledge on which spatial planning is based-includes issues rooted both in the social sciences, natural science and the humanities. Spatial planners need knowledge about the likely consequences of different alternatives of action, as well as understanding of the role of plans and planning processes in the development of society. This is reflected in the two-fold focus of planning research on both substantive and procedural issues. Whereas research on the role of plans and planning processes takes place mainly within a non-positivist social science paradigm, the research aiming to provide planners with the knowledge needed in order to make good plans is often situated in the battlefield between opposing positions within theory of science. Because planning research has both society and the physical as its subject of inquiry, a reflective opinion about the interaction between the physical environment and human actions is crucial. Traditionally, many spatial planners have conceived of this in a quite näive way, assuming that human behaviour can to a high extent be shaped or controlled by manipulating the physical environment. During recent decades, this view has been sharply criticized by anti-positivist scholars, and some theorists point out the great uncertainty, close to impossibility, in predicting human actions, even at an aggregate scale. The latter position has dramatic implications to spatial planning, as it would then be impossible to assess whether a certain physical solution is likely to have positive or negative social and related environmental consequences, e.g. in terms of travelling distances and modal split. Our own position is that the physical environment, along with a number of individual and non-physical structural factors, influences human activities and quality of life. To some extent, this influence can be predicted at an aggregate scale, but not for a particular individual (except those actions rendered impossible by the laws of physics). How strong influence the physical environment exerts, is a question requiring empirical research in order to be answered.
Suggested Citation
Petter NÆss & Inger-Lise Saglie, 2000.
"Surviving Between the Trenches: Planning Research, Methodology and Theory of Science,"
European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(6), pages 729-750, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:8:y:2000:i:6:p:729-750
DOI: 10.1080/713666435
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- António Ferreira & Peter Batey & Marco Te Brömmelstroet & Luca Bertolini, 2012.
"Beyond the Dilemma of Mobility: Exploring New Ways of Matching Intellectual and Physical Mobility,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(3), pages 688-704, March.
- Petra H Roodbol-Mekkes & Arnold J J van der Valk & Willem K Korthals Altes, 2012.
"The Netherlands Spatial Planning Doctrine in Disarray in the 21st Century,"
Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(2), pages 377-395, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:8:y:2000:i:6:p:729-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.