IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v8y2000i5p651-668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Euroscepticism', Political Agendas and Spatial Planning: British National and Regional Planning Policy in Uncertain Times

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Tewdwr-Jones
  • Kevin Bishop
  • David Wilkinson

Abstract

Over the last 10 years, European Union interest in planning has increased significantly. Although land use planning remains a function of each member state, the legal obligations imposed by the EU in the fields of environmental law, structural funds, the Common Agricultural Policy, and Trans-European Transport Networks, have all impacted upon the context of the operation of the British planning process. Many of the EU initiatives have had to be transposed into domestic legislation, while others form an important-if oft-times uncertain-framework for British policy-makers. This paper examines the relationship between the European Union's policies and initiatives as they have potentially impacted upon the British planning system and the contents of Britain's national and regional planning policy guidance to local planning authorities in the assessment period 1988-1997. But the Conservative governments adopted a 'Eurosceptic' approach to their relations with Europe and, as demonstrated within this paper, also towards spatial planning issues that caused uncertainty in practice. The research indicates that although the EU has impacted upon British planning, particularly at the local level of government, this has not been reflected at the national and regional levels in planning policy documentation, mainly because of the 'Eurosceptic' attitude of the government. Policy-makers at both the national and regional levels in England, Scotland and Wales are now recognizing the need, however, to keep apace with changes occurring simultaneously with regard to enhanced European integration, and the approach of the Blair government since 1997 has re-focused the relationship between the EU and UK over spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Kevin Bishop & David Wilkinson, 2000. "'Euroscepticism', Political Agendas and Spatial Planning: British National and Regional Planning Policy in Uncertain Times," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(5), pages 651-668, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:8:y:2000:i:5:p:651-668
    DOI: 10.1080/713666425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/713666425
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/713666425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Donatella Cialdea & Sandro Privitera, 2021. "Landscape Values as a Driving Force to Increase Nature Conservation. Environmental and Planning Policies as a Possible Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Marjolein Spaans, 2005. "Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England," ERSA conference papers ersa05p235, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Neil Harris & Alan Hooper & Kevin Bishop, 2002. "Constructing the Practice of ‘Spatial Planning’: A National Spatial Planning Framework for Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 20(4), pages 555-572, August.
    4. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    5. Gordon Dabinett, 2010. "Spatial Justice and the Translation of European Strategic Planning Ideas in the Urban Sub-region of South Yorkshire," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2389-2408, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:8:y:2000:i:5:p:651-668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.