IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v30y2022i12p2394-2411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Back and forth between openness and focusing: handling complexity in land use and transport coordination

Author

Listed:
  • Patrik Tornberg
  • John Odhage

Abstract

This paper examines how complexity at the land use and transport (LUT) interface can be handled in practice, empirically focusing on a planning activity in Swedish national transport planning, so called Strategic Choice of Measures (SCM). Viewing LUT coordination as a question of handling complexity along two dimensions, one relating to the substantial issues of the problem, the other to the actors involved, the relation between open and focused approaches to delimitation of scope and the participation of actors are analysed in three SCM case studies. The study highlights two necessary but potentially contradicting conditions for LUT coordination. On the one hand, the complexity of problems at the LUT interface requires a comprehensive perspective and a diverse set of participants to enable a sufficiently wide framing of these problems. On the other hand, strategically rational actors will demand an approach which maintains a high degree of relevance for their particular interests, and the process therefore requires a focus on selected issues. The paper concludes that handling complexity at the LUT interface requires an acknowledgement of the need for both approaches, arguing that LUT coordination is benefitted by seeing openness and focusing as complementary rather than contradictory approaches in planning situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrik Tornberg & John Odhage, 2022. "Back and forth between openness and focusing: handling complexity in land use and transport coordination," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(12), pages 2394-2411, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:30:y:2022:i:12:p:2394-2411
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1926437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2021.1926437
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2021.1926437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:30:y:2022:i:12:p:2394-2411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.