IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v24y2016i2p344-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?

Author

Listed:
  • Terje Skjeggedal
  • Kjell Overvåg
  • jan åge Riseth

Abstract

This article discusses how land-use planning and management can combine the aim of local development with the protection of mountain areas. The basis for this double approach comprises protected areas and the land-use element of the Municipal Master Plan according to the Nature Diversity Act and the Planning and Building Act (PBA), respectively. Case studies performed in six mountain municipalities show that the planning processes in general are performed by a combination of rationalistic and communicative rationality based on consensus and with little awareness of power structures. Today's two-part system is dominated by the interests backing protection, not only in the protected areas, but also in the buffer-zones. Though the conflicts are rather few, they nevertheless often seem deep-set and rooted in national--local power relations. We argue that a more agonistic and decentralized approach where the protection-area management is transferred to the PBA will, to a larger extent, be able to combine both use and protection and to stimulate local development in mountain municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Terje Skjeggedal & Kjell Overvåg & jan åge Riseth, 2016. "Land-Use Planning in Norwegian Mountain Areas: Local Development or Nature Protection?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 344-363, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:24:y:2016:i:2:p:344-363
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2015.1048187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hausner, Vera Helene & Engen, Sigrid & Muñoz, Lorena & Fauchald, Per, 2021. "Assessing a nationwide policy reform toward community-based conservation of biological diversity and ecosystem services in the Alpine North," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:24:y:2016:i:2:p:344-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.