IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v21y2013i10p1598-1610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resilience in the Light of Climate Change: Useful Approach or Empty Phrase for Spatial Planning?

Author

Listed:
  • Meike Albers
  • Sonja Deppisch

Abstract

In the context of adaptation to climate change and spatial planning, the idea of urban and regional resilience has been attracting increasing attention because it recognizes both the given uncertainty of climate change and the complexity of cities and regions. Even if initial attempts have been made to operationalize the concept of resilience, a gap exists between the intense theoretical discussion and the use of resilience thinking in planning practice. On the basis of a discussion of existing attempts that define resilience principles, the authors derive eight principles for urban and regional resilience: diversity, redundancy, flexibility and adaptability, modularity, interdependency, stabilizing and buffering factors, mobility, as well as planning and foresight. Referring to two exploratory studies--the City and Region of Stockholm (Sweden) and the City and Region of Rostock (Germany)--this article aims to explore whether spatial planning already contributes to these principles and so to build resilience. The analysis shows that spatial planning already contributes to urban and regional resilience. Also, the principles, as suggested here, can be used to operationalize the idea of resilience. Prospectively, such principles may support spatial planning to choose adaptation measures and specific objectives and to contribute to urban and regional resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Meike Albers & Sonja Deppisch, 2013. "Resilience in the Light of Climate Change: Useful Approach or Empty Phrase for Spatial Planning?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(10), pages 1598-1610, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:21:y:2013:i:10:p:1598-1610
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2012.722961
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2012.722961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Rega & Alessandro Bonifazi, 2020. "The Rise of Resilience in Spatial Planning: A Journey through Disciplinary Boundaries and Contested Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Dominik Sędzicki & Jan Cudzik & Wojciech Bonenberg & Lucyna Nyka, 2022. "Computer-Aided Automated Greenery Design—Towards a Green BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Vanesa Castán Broto & Linda K. Westman, 2020. "Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), July.
    4. Brahim Herbane, 2020. "Locational Contiguity and Business Continuity: Perceived Organizational Resilience of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in U.K. Business Parks," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    5. Donghyun Kim & Up Lim, 2016. "Urban Resilience in Climate Change Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, April.
    6. JiYoung Park & G. William Page, 2017. "Innovative green economy, urban economic performance and urban environments: an empirical analysis of US cities," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 772-789, May.
    7. Katherine E. Laycock & Wayne Caldwell, 2018. "Exploring Community Cohesion in Rural Canada Post-Extreme Weather: Planning Ahead for Unknown Stresses," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 77-97, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:21:y:2013:i:10:p:1598-1610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.