IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v19y2011i4p647-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public-Private Partnership: A Delusion for Urban Regeneration? Evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Codecasa
  • Davide Ponzini

Abstract

Public-private partnership (PPP) is currently sought by scholars and policy-makers as a tool for overcoming the financial crisis of the State and low performance in public administration. Also, it is deemed as an opportunity to bring added value to projects and their contents in order to meet new, emerging social demands. Despite the growing attention paid to PPPs, international literature has been questioning their actual effectiveness and viability. PPPs suffer indeed from a lack of strategy-making and dynamism in public sector organizations: public action geared towards private business cooperation requires advanced accounting, management and steering skills that cannot be easily developed. Such issues match with the latest developments in the field of urban regeneration and represent a major stake for local governments. On the basis of empirical evidence from Italian urban regeneration projects, the paper highlights an actual paradox for urban policies. Even when favourable conditions for project management are met in the public sector, PPPs seem either unable to deliver innovative solutions or secure an actual, long-term engagement of private and public resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Codecasa & Davide Ponzini, 2011. "Public-Private Partnership: A Delusion for Urban Regeneration? Evidence from Italy," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 647-667, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:19:y:2011:i:4:p:647-667
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2011.548471
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2011.548471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik-Hans Klijn & Geert R. Teisman, 2003. "Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public—Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Metaxas, Theodore & Preza, Elisavet, 2012. "Public- Private Partnerships in Southeastern Europe: The case of Croatia," MPRA Paper 43830, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Veiko LEMBER & Ole Helby PETERSEN & Walter SCHERRER & Robert ÅGREN, 2019. "Understanding The Relationship Between Infrastructure Public‒Private Partnerships And Innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 371-391, June.
    3. Li, Lingyue & Xiao, Yang, 2022. "Capital accumulation and urban land development in China: (Re)making Expo Park in Shanghai," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Martijn van den Hurk & Marlies Hueskes, 2017. "Beyond the financial logic: Realizing valuable outcomes in public–private partnerships in Flanders and Ontario," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 784-808, August.
    5. Zhang, Jiayu & Yang, Xiaodong & Wang, Hao, 2021. "Age-friendly regeneration of urban settlements in China: Game and incentives of stakeholders in decision-making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    6. Chin, Jae Teuk, 2021. "The shifting role of public–private partnerships in vacant property redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Annalisa Caloffi & Francesca Gambarotto, 2017. "Cognitive distance in public procurement and public–private partnerships: An analysis of the construction sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 765-783, August.
    9. Bruce M. Taylor & Ben P. Harman, 2016. "Governing urban development for climate risk: What role for public–private partnerships?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 927-944, August.
    10. Mina Simona & Surugiu Ioana, 2013. "Different ways of analysing the effects of public-private partnership in organizing public services," Constanta Maritime University Annals, Constanta Maritime University, vol. 20(2), pages 247-250.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fandel, Günter & Giese, Anke & Mohn, Brigitte, 2012. "Measuring synergy effects of a Public Social Private Partnership (PSPP) project," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 815-824.
    2. Tim Benijts, 2014. "A Business Sustainability Model for Government Corporations. A Belgian Case Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 204-216, March.
    3. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2016. "A Development Process of PPP Scheme for Infrastructure Projects in Vietnam," OSF Preprints g3e4u, Center for Open Science.
    4. Luo, Lanlan & Zou, Ziran & Chen, Shou, 2021. "Discounting for public-private partnership projects in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 218-226.
    5. Rachael Nsasira & Benon C. Basheka & Pross. N. Oluka, 2013. "Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and Enhanced Service Delivery in Uganda: Implications from the Energy Sector," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 48-60, May.
    6. Tessmann, R. & Elbert, R., 2022. "Multi sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132320, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    7. Ola MATTISSON & Anna THOMASSON, 2007. "The Strategic Process And Its Impact On The Outcome Of A Tender," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(3), pages 439-454, September.
    8. Mariateresa Torchia & Andrea Calabrò, 2018. "Increasing the Governance Standards of Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare. Evidence from Italy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 93-110, March.
    9. Deborah de Lange, 2023. "Sustainable Transportation for the Climate: How Do Transportation Firms Engage in Cooperative Public-Private Partnerships?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Yubo Guo & Igor Martek & Chuan Chen, 2019. "Policy Evolution in the Chinese PPP Market: The Shifting Strategies of Governmental Support Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Sarmento, Joaquim Miranda & Renneboog, Luc, 2021. "Renegotiating public-private partnerships," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Rhys Andrews & Marc Esteve & Tamyko Ysa, 2015. "Public-private joint ventures: mixing oil and water?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 265-272, July.
    13. Bipasha Baruah, 2007. "Assessment of public–private–NGO partnerships: Water and sanitation services in slums," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(3), pages 226-237, August.
    14. Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 829-872, June.
    15. Thais Rangel & Jesús Galende, 2010. "Innovation in public--private partnerships (PPPs): the Spanish case of highway concessions," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 49-54, January.
    16. Veiko LEMBER & Ole Helby PETERSEN & Walter SCHERRER & Robert ÅGREN, 2019. "Understanding The Relationship Between Infrastructure Public‒Private Partnerships And Innovation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 371-391, June.
    17. Lei Yang & Longji Hu & Yifan Li, 2024. "Institutional Environment, Institutional Arrangements, and Risk Identification and Allocation in Public–Private Partnerships: A Multilevel Model Analysis Based on Data from 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    18. Tahir Nisar, 2007. "Risk Management in Public–Private Partnership Contracts," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2021. "Sponsorship’s Financial Sustainability for Cultural Conservation and Enhancement Strategies: An Innovative Model for Sponsees and Sponsors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    20. Motkuri, Venkatanarayana & Khan, Amir Ullah, 2018. "Macro Economy and Health in India," MPRA Paper 84512, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:19:y:2011:i:4:p:647-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.