IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v2y1993i3p495-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of the impact of accounting differences on profits and return on equity

Author

Listed:
  • Niclas Hellman

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to make a quantitative comparative analysis of differences between Swedish accounting practice and US GAAP. The empirical data consisted of eighty-four US GAAP reconciliations of income statements and shareholders' equity, disclosed in Swedish annual reports during 1981-90. Prior qualitative research has suggested that Swedish accounting practice is conservative compared with that in the USA. However, the empirical analysis of profits and return on equity provided little support for this hypothesis. Instead, there were indications of a less conservative accounting treatment in the Swedish accounts compared with US GAAP. The most material differences between Swedish profits and those calculated using US GAAP were caused by differences in treatment of foreign currency translation, income taxes, sale and leaseback transactions and business combinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Niclas Hellman, 1993. "A comparative analysis of the impact of accounting differences on profits and return on equity," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 495-530.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:2:y:1993:i:3:p:495-530
    DOI: 10.1080/09638189300000049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638189300000049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638189300000049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maroney, James J. & McGarry, Clodagh & Ó hÓgartaigh, Ciarán, 2008. "Familiarity, home bias and investors’ reactions to 20-F reconciliation gains and losses and perceptions of the quality of accounting principles," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 103-122.
    2. Jiafeng Gu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal context and firm performance: The mediating effect of strategic interaction," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 371-391, March.
    3. Senol Emir & Hasan Dincer & Umit Hacioglu & Serhat Yuksel, 2015. "Comparative Study of Outlier Detection Algorithms via Fundamental Analysis Variables:An Application on Firms Listed in Borsa Istanbul," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 4(4), pages 45-60, October.
    4. Street, Donna L. & Nichols, Nancy B. & Gray, Sidney J., 2000. "Assessing the Acceptability of International Accounting Standards in the US: An Empirical Study of the Materiality of US GAAP Reconciliations by Non-US Companies Complying with IASC Standards," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 27-63, March.
    5. Chan, Kam C. & Seow, Gim S., 1996. "The association between stock returns and foreign GAAP earnings versus earnings adjusted to U.S. GAAP," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 139-158, February.
    6. Lainez, Jose A. & Callao, Susana, 2000. "The effect of accounting diversity on international financial analysis: empirical evidence," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 65-83, March.
    7. Michael McCrae & Henrik Nilsson, 2001. "The explanatory and predictive power of different specifications of the Ohlson (1995) valuation models," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 315-341.
    8. Vergoossen, R.G.A., 1996. "US GAAP and annual reporting by Dutch companies listed in the United States," Serie Research Memoranda 0041, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:2:y:1993:i:3:p:495-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.