IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v2y1993i2p199-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems in measuring the cash recovery rate and measurement error in estimates of the firm IRR

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Stark

Abstract

This paper considers the impact on estimates of the IRR derived from the cash recovery rate approach to the estimation of economic performance of an inability to observe the conceptually defined CRR from accounting data. In particular, it considers a typical proxy used in empirical applications of the CRR approach and asks the question — under what circumstances will this proxy fail to measure the true CRR? Two circumstances are identified. First, the empirical CRR will not measure the true CRR when advertising and research expenditures exist which should be treated as part of the composite investment (and, hence, as investment expenditures) but are expensed in the accounting records -referred to as the capitalize/expense case. Second, the empirical CRR will not measure the true CRR when the composite investment is made up of projects with different lives — referred to as the retirement case. For these two cases, relationships are developed between the proxy and the true CRR. From these relationships the impact of errors in measuring the CRR on estimates of the IRR are deduced. Analytically, it is demonstrated that, in the capitalize/expense case, the inability to measure the CRR produces measurement error in the IRR estimate that is monotonically and negatively related to the rate of investment growth. Further, as the proportion of expensed investment expenditures increases, measurement error increases if the investment growth rate is less than the IRR and decreases if the investment growth rate is greater than the IRR. In the retirement case, it is identified analytically that measurement error also will be monotonically and negatively related to the investment growth rate. This is the case even though the analyst is able to specify the basic relationship between investment outflows and subsequent cash inflows (the inability to spec ify this basic relationship is a problem considered in many papers on the CRR approach). Numerical examples suggest that these effects are not insignificant in size a priori.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Stark, 1993. "Problems in measuring the cash recovery rate and measurement error in estimates of the firm IRR," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 199-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:2:y:1993:i:2:p:199-218
    DOI: 10.1080/09638189300000019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638189300000019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638189300000019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griner, E. H. & Stark, A. W., 1988. "Cash recovery rates, accounting rates of return, and the estimation of economic performance," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 293-311.
    2. Badr E. Ismail, 1987. "Some time series properties of corporate cash recovery rates," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 76-88, September.
    3. Dhaliwal, Dan S. & Salamon, Gerald L. & Dan Smith, E., 1982. "The effect of owner versus management control on the choice of accounting methods," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 41-53, July.
    4. Salamon, Gerald L., 1988. "On the validity of accounting rates of return in cross-sectional analysis: Theory, evidence, and implications," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 267-292.
    5. Griner, E. H. & Stark, A. W., 1991. "On the properties of measurement error in cash-recovery-rate-based estimates of economic performance," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 207-223.
    6. Hagerman, Robert L. & Zmijewski, Mark E., 1979. "Some economic determinants of accounting policy choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 141-161, August.
    7. Habbard, Carl M. & Jensen, Robert E., 1991. "Lack of robustness and systematic bias in cash recovery rate methods of deriving internal (Economic) rates of return for business firms," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 225-242.
    8. Hirschey, M & Weygandt, Jj, 1985. "Amortization Policy For Advertising And Research And Development Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 326-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alnoor Bhimani, 2002. "European management accounting research: traditions in the making," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 99-117.
    2. repec:dgr:rugsom:00e42 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Feenstra, D.W. & Wang, H., 2000. "Economic and accounting rates of return," Research Report 00E42, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas W. Scott, 1991. "Pension disclosures under SFAS No. 87: Theory and evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 62-81, September.
    2. Rã‰Al Labelle, 1990. "Bond covenants and changes in accounting policy: Canadian evidence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 677-698, March.
    3. Rã‰Al Labelle, 1990. "Clauses restrictives et modifications comptables: une étude canadienne," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(2), pages 699-723, March.
    4. Darrough, Masako N. & Pourjalali, Hamid & Saudagaran, Shahrokh, 1998. "Earnings management in Japanese companies," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 313-334.
    5. Susana Callao & José Ignacio Jarne, 2010. "Have IFRS Affected Earnings Management in the European Union?," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 159-189, December.
    6. Khaled Alsaifi & Marwa Elnahass & Aly Salama, 2020. "Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 711-726, February.
    7. Astami, Emita W. & Tower, Greg, 2006. "Accounting-policy choice and firm characteristics in the Asia Pacific region: An international empirical test of Costly Contracting Theory," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 1-21.
    8. Heibatollah Sami & Mary Jeanne Welsh, 1992. "Characteristics of early and late adopters of pension accounting standard SFAS No. 87," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 212-236, September.
    9. Han, Bong H. & Manry, David, 2004. "The value-relevance of R&D and advertising expenditures: Evidence from Korea," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 155-173.
    10. Dechow, Patricia & Ge, Weili & Schrand, Catherine, 2010. "Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 344-401, December.
    11. Brown, Lawrence D., 1996. "Influential accounting articles, individuals, Ph.D. granting institutions and faculties: A citational analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 723-754.
    12. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    13. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    14. Sangil Kim & Jungmin Yoo, 2017. "Does R&D Expenditure with Heavy Related Party Transactions Harm Firm Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Peter M. Clarkson & Jennifer L. Kao & Gordon D. Richardson, 1994. "The Voluntary Inclusion of Forecasts in the MD&A Section of Annual Reports," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 423-450, June.
    16. Atoche, Teresa duarte & Pérez lópez, José ángel & Camúñez ruiz, Jose antonio, 2012. "La relevancia de los gastos de I+D. Estudio empírico en el sector del automóvil," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 257-286.
    17. Nader Mansouri, 2014. "The Determinants Of Management Provisions After The Introduction Of Ias / Ifrs Standards In France [Les Determinants De La Gestion Des Provisions (Prc) Apres L’Introduction Des Normes Ias/Ifrs En F," Post-Print hal-01899131, HAL.
    18. Yura Kim & Taeyeon Kim & Hye-Jeong Nam, 2021. "Marketing Investments and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Bayer, Emanuel & Srinivasan, Shuba & Riedl, Edward J. & Skiera, Bernd, 2020. "The impact of online display advertising and paid search advertising relative to offline advertising on firm performance and firm value," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 789-804.
    20. Anne Schmitz & Nieves Villaseñor-Román, 2018. "Do Brands Matter in Unlisted Firms? An Empirical Study of the Association between Brand Equity and Financial Performance," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:2:y:1993:i:2:p:199-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.