IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/edecon/v5y1997i3p307-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theory Meets Reality in the Education Voucher Debate: Some Evidence from Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Taryn Rounds Parry

Abstract

This paper contributes to the education voucher debate by evaluating some of the most fundamental arguments supporting vouchers. Analysis of an authentuc voucher system in Chile shows that punlic schools produce higher quality education as measured by the achievement test scores after controlling for school resources and the tyoe of student enrolled. However, the findings also indicate that each type of schoold specializes: public schools achieve higher preformance with disadcantaged children while private schools produce higher scores with 'high quality' students (students whose parents have high education levels or students who have higher scores initially). Second, greater competition may lead to higher quality education, but the size of the effect is larger for private schools. Moreover, it appears that compettion promotes municipalities to spend more wisely on education from their own-source revenues and this additional spending raises public-school scores in competitive areas. Hence, public schools may repond to competitive pressures even though they are hindered by a centralized, more bureaucratic adiministration than private schools. Competition itself may deserve greater emphasis than traditional privatization arguments for improving the quality of education.

Suggested Citation

  • Taryn Rounds Parry, 1997. "Theory Meets Reality in the Education Voucher Debate: Some Evidence from Chile," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 307-331.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:5:y:1997:i:3:p:307-331
    DOI: 10.1080/09645299700000025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09645299700000025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09645299700000025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. -, 1991. "Informe social 1990," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 35119, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Bearse & Buly A. Cardak & Gerhard Glomm & B. Ravikumar, 2009. "Why do Education Vouchers Fail?," CAEPR Working Papers 2009-014, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    2. Kutscher, Macarena & Nath, Shanjukta & Urzúa, Sergio, 2023. "Centralized admission systems and school segregation: Evidence from a national reform," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    3. Patrick McEwan, 2001. "The Effectiveness of Public, Catholic, and Non-Religious Private Schools in Chile's Voucher System," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 103-128.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edmonds, Christopher M., 1999. "The Effect Of Technology Transfer Program Participation On Small Farms In Chile," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21520, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Dennis J. Devine & Jennifer Buddenbaum & Stephanie Houp & Dennis P. Stolle & Nathan Studebaker, 2007. "Deliberation Quality: A Preliminary Examination in Criminal Juries," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 273-303, July.
    3. Hélène Garner & Dominique Méda & Claudia Sénik, 2006. "La place du travail dans les identités," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 393(1), pages 21-40.
    4. García Hurtado, Alvaro & Schkolnik, Mariana, 1994. "Overcoming poverty: an evaluation and future recommendations," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34056, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:5:y:1997:i:3:p:307-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.