IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/edecon/v5y1997i1p63-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Government School Priorities: Teaching Input and Class Size in Norway, 1980-1992

Author

Listed:
  • Rune Sørensen

Abstract

Increased local government autonomy can cause broader inequalities in the supply of education services. This paper analyzes the municipalities' priorities concerning basic education. The analysis is based on a model where the communes' resources are broken down into teaching input per class, class size and administrative outlays in the period 1980-1992. The model assumes that the commune's priorities regarding basic education are dependent on municipal economic constraints, the residential demands for basic education and other municipal services. The analysis reaches the following conclusions. (1) The resources input in basic schooling has increased markedly during the period 1980-1992. The total teaching input in work-years per class has increased from 1.5 to 2.0, and the mean class size has been reduced from 19 to 17 pupils. The disparities increased somewhat in the period 1980-1985, while they were stable in the period 1986-1992. The disparities were greatest in class size and least in teaching input per class. (2) The teaching input per student is quite insensitive to variations in local government revenues, and the resource level of basic schooling is less dependent on municipal income than are other municipal services. Revenue sensitivity is low in the short term, but greater with permanent changes in local revenue. (3) The level of basic schooling hardly competes with resource requirements in other municipal sectors. The resource input into basic schooling is slightly reduced where the proportion of the population exceeds 80 years of age or is under school age. (4) Those communes where the inhabitants have a high social status do not give priority to basic schooling at the expense of other municipal services. The resource input into basic schooling does not vary noticeably with the level of population, general education or income. (5) Little indicates that the transition from earmarked central government grants to a block grant system has resulted in a lower priority being accorded to basic schooling. The level of basic school resources has, however, become somewhat more sensitive to variations in municipal income base and demographic factors after the introduction of the new grant scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Rune Sørensen, 1997. "Local Government School Priorities: Teaching Input and Class Size in Norway, 1980-1992," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 63-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:5:y:1997:i:1:p:63-89
    DOI: 10.1080/09645299700000005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09645299700000005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09645299700000005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Varga, Júlia, 2000. "A közoktatás-finanszírozási rendszer hatása az egyenlőségre, 1990 1997 [The effect on equality of the system of funding public education, 1990-97]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 531-548.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:edecon:v:5:y:1997:i:1:p:63-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.