IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v24y2012i1p101-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adding Supply-Driven Consumption Makes The Ghosh Model Even More Implausible

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Oosterhaven

Abstract

Guerra and Sancho (2011) argue that adding a supply-driven consumption function to the Ghosh model diminishes its implausibility in the case of centrally planned economies. Extending the Leontief model with a demand-driven consumption function does make that model more realistic. Extending the Ghosh model, however, makes it even more implausible in the case of a market economy, while it becomes even more problematic as a guide for a centrally planned economy. The prime reason is that complementarities between inputs are negated, not only for firms, but now also for households. Consequently, industry and aggregate output may now increase, while corresponding value added decreases, and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Oosterhaven, 2012. "Adding Supply-Driven Consumption Makes The Ghosh Model Even More Implausible," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 101-111, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:24:y:2012:i:1:p:101-111
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2011.635137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2011.635137
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2011.635137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:rri:bkchap:04 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. William H. Miernyk, 1965. "The Elements of Input-Output Analysis," Wholbk, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, number 04, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan C. Surís-Regueiro & José L. Santiago, 2016. "An Input-Output methodological proposal to quantifying socio economic impacts linked to supply shocks," Working Papers 1603, Universidade de Vigo, Departamento de Economía Aplicada.
    2. Fidel Aroche Reyes & Marco Antonio Marquez Mendoza, 2021. "Demand-Driven and Supply-Sided Input–Output Models," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(2), pages 251-267, June.
    3. Oosterhaven, Jan, 2017. "Key Sector Analysis," Research Report 17015-GEM, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    4. repec:dgr:rugsom:13017-gem is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Michiyuki Yagi & Shigemi Kagawa & Shunsuke Managi & Hidemichi Fujii & Dabo Guan, 2020. "Supply Constraint from Earthquakes in Japan in Input–Output Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1811-1830, September.
    6. Manresa, Antonio & Sancho, Ferran, 2013. "Supply and demand biases in linear interindustry models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 94-100.
    7. Maria Sassi, 2023. "Economic Connectiveness and Pro-Poor Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Maurizio Droli & Ting Fa Margherita Chang & Luca Iseppi & Livio Clemente Piccinini, 2014. "Managing Trade Contacts in HotRest Intermediate Markets: A Resource-Based View Analysis in EU Countries," Tourism Economics, , vol. 20(4), pages 757-778, August.
    9. Linn Svegrup & Jonas Johansson & Henrik Hassel, 2019. "Integration of Critical Infrastructure and Societal Consequence Models: Impact on Swedish Power System Mitigation Decisions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1970-1996, September.
    10. Chen, Quanrun & Chen, Xikang & Pei, Jiansuo & Yang, Cuihong & Zhu, Kunfu, 2020. "Estimating domestic content in China’s exports: Accounting for a dual-trade regime," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 43-54.
    11. Reinout Heijungs & Arjan Koning, 2019. "Analyzing the effects of the choice of model in the context of marginal changes in final demand," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Oosterhaven, Jan, 2015. "On the doubtful usability of the inoperability IO model," Research Report 15008-EEF, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    13. Marquez, Marco, 2022. "Supply, demand and economic growth in Mexico in the period 1980–2016," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    14. Jan Oosterhaven & Michiya Nozaki, 2014. "The impact of production and infrastructure shocks to the Japanese inter-regional economy: A non-linear input-output programming approach," ERSA conference papers ersa14p163, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Oosterhaven, J. & Bouwmeester, M.C. & Nozaki, M., 2013. "The impact of production and infrastructure shocks," Research Report 13017-GEM, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Aaron Praktiknjo, 2016. "The Value of Lost Load for Sectoral Load Shedding Measures: The German Case with 51 Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Almeida, Lucas Milanez de Lima & Balanco, Paulo Antonio de Freitas, 2020. "Application of multivariate analysis as complementary instrument in studies about structural changes: An example of the multipliers in the US economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 189-207.
    18. Yagi, Michiyuki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Global supply constraints from the 2008 and COVID-19 crises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 514-528.
    19. Michael Humavindu & Jesper Stage, 2013. "Key Sectors of the Namibian Economy," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeuli, Kimberly A. & Deller, Steven C., 2007. "Measuring the Local Economic Impact of Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Henryk Gurgul & Paweł Majdosz, 2006. "Interfund linkage analysis: the case of the polish pension fund sector," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27.
    3. Kemper, Nathan & Popp, Jennie S. Hughes & Miller, Wayne P. & Goodwin, Harold L., Jr., 2006. "Running to Stand Still: Challenges Economists Face with Imperfect Data," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35315, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. John M. Clapp, 1977. "The Relationships among Regional Input-Output, Intersectoral Flows and Rows-Only Analysis," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 2(1), pages 79-89, October.
    5. Fuglestad, Paul & O'Neill, John L., 1985. "An Analysis Of Resource Development In The Talkeetna Basin, Alaska," Staff Reports 277656, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Johnson, Thomas G., 1983. "On the Standardization of Input-Output Multipliers," 1983 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 3, West Lafayette, Indiana 279117, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Drummond, H. Evan & White, Fred C., 1974. "A Predictive Model For Manpower Requirements In Georgia Agriculture," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, July.
    8. Maki, Wilbur R., 1981. "Input-Output Methods For Labor Market Analysis And Projection," Staff Papers 13442, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Brucker, Sharon M., 1980. "New Measures From Input-Output Studies: A Comparison Of Traditional Multipliers And Growth-Equalized Multipliers," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 1-7, October.
    10. Findeis, Jill L., 1983. "Input-Output Analysis: A Methodology for Assessing Short Run Changes in Exogenous Prices, Output, and Final Demand," AE & RS Research Reports 257691, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    11. Otto, Daniel M., 1986. "Economic Linkages Between Agriculture and Other Sectors Within Rural America," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278114, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Kasal, James & Magleby, Richard, 1988. "Economic Impact Evaluation Using Implan: A Case Study Of The Nebraska Panhandle Project," Staff Reports 277950, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Xiao, Shiying & Yan, Jun & Zhang, Panpan, 2022. "Incorporating auxiliary information in betweenness measure for input–output networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    14. Deller, Steven C., 2004. "Wisconsin and the Agricultural Economy," Staff Paper Series 471, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. Zuzana Bednaříková, 2012. "Ekonomický přínos zemědělství pro venkovskou ekonomiku: aplikace input-output analýzy [The Economic Contribution of Agriculture for Rural Economy? An Application of Input-Output Analysis]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(2), pages 265-285.
    16. Tomislav Gelo & Nika Šimurina & Jurica Šimurina, 2021. "The Economic Impact of Investment in Renewables in Croatia by 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Gordon Mulligan & Randall Jackson & Amanda Krugh, 2013. "Economic base multipliers: a comparison of ACDS and IMPLAN," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 289-303, August.
    18. Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (Ed.), 2012. "Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse. Tagungsband: Beiträge zum Halleschen Input-Output-Workshop 2010," IWH-Sonderhefte 1/2012, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    19. Hwang, Henry H. & Maki, Wilbur R., 1979. "Users' Guide To The Minnesota Two-Region Input-Output Model," Staff Papers 13831, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Clemente Polo & Elisabeth Valle, 2016. "Tourism Interactions and Redistribution Effects in the Balearic Islands: A SAM Analysis," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(2), pages 353-374, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:24:y:2012:i:1:p:101-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.