IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v16y2005i2p127-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'I have seen the future and it works': The US defence industry transformation - lessons for the UK defence industrial base

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Hayward

Abstract

The US has embarked upon a major transformation of its approach to defence industrial base planning. Although bureaucratic and industrial inertia, as well as budgetary constraints, may delay transformation, its effects will lead to radical changes in the US defence industrial base with new entrants and new combinations of players. The UK, with more modest defence ambitions, capabilities and budget, will seek to keep in touch with the US. However, a commercially-led drive to embed UK industry even more deeply in the US defence market could be the last step in creating a largely US-UK North Atlantic relationship, with much of Europe very much a subsidiary business concern. This contains a risk that the UK will become increasingly dependent on the US for design and integration of major systems and national defence industrial capability focused on a limited number of niche technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Hayward, 2005. "'I have seen the future and it works': The US defence industry transformation - lessons for the UK defence industrial base," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 127-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:127-141
    DOI: 10.1080/1024269032000110559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1024269032000110559
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1024269032000110559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Hartley & Todd Sandler, 2003. "The Future of the Defence Firm," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 361-380, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gholz, Eugene & James, Andrew D. & Speller, Thomas H., 2018. "The second face of systems integration: An empirical analysis of supply chains to complex product systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1478-1494.
    2. Damien Besancenot & Radu Vranceanu, 2006. "European Defence Firms: The Information Barrier On Private Finance," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 23-36.
    3. Paul Dowdall & Derek Braddon & Keith Hartley, 2004. "The UK defence electronics industry: adjusting to change," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 565-586.
    4. Gangopadhyay Partha, 2014. "A Formal Model of Arms Market with Cash-for-Favours," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 411-428, August.
    5. ., 2014. "A company case study. BAE Systems: achievements, rivals and prospects," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Aerospace Industries, chapter 8, pages 141-161, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Keith Hartley & Richard White & David Chaundy, 1997. "Government and industry performance: a comparative study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9), pages 1227-1237.
    7. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2005. "Le financement public du secteur de la défense, une source d'inefficacité," ESSEC Working Papers DR 05008, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:16:y:2005:i:2:p:127-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.