IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v34y2013i9p1605-1629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Enclosures? Polanyi, international investment law and the global land rush

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenzo Cotula

Abstract

Seven decades after its first publication, Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation remains one of the most insightful readings about the socioeconomic changes associated with the Industrial Revolution, and the ways in which law facilitated, or countered, moves towards the commodification of land at that time. As today’s global land rush brings competing land claims into contest, new transitions are occurring between more commodified and more ‘socially embedded’ conceptualisations of land. Using Polanyi’s framework, this article analyses the role of international law in these processes. International investment law construes land as a commercial asset, can facilitate access to land for foreign investors and imposes discipline on the exercise of regulatory powers in land matters. But shifts in the political economy that underpins international investment law and growing recourse to international human rights law are creating new opportunities for reflecting the non-commercial (cultural, social, political) relations within which land rights remain embedded in many societies. When contrasting conceptualisations of land collide, the relative strength of legal rights and enforcement mechanisms become particularly important. Ultimately, the legitimacy of international law to mediate between competing land claims will depend on the extent to which it can recognise the multiple values that society attaches to land.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenzo Cotula, 2013. "The New Enclosures? Polanyi, international investment law and the global land rush," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 1605-1629, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:34:y:2013:i:9:p:1605-1629
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.843847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2013.843847
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2013.843847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wegayehu Fitawek & Sheryl L. Hendriks, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of Large-Scale Agricultural Investments on Household Food Security Using an Endogenous Switching Regression Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Dell’Angelo, Jampel & D’Odorico, Paolo & Rulli, Maria Cristina & Marchand, Philippe, 2017. "The Tragedy of the Grabbed Commons: Coercion and Dispossession in the Global Land Rush," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Akolgo-Azupogo, Helen & Bardy, Roland & Rubens, Arthur, 2021. "Land governance in Northern Ghana: Creating communities of practice between tribal leaders and the government," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Atenchong Talleh Nkobou & Andrew Ainslie & Stefanie Lemke, 2022. "Broken promises: a rights-based analysis of marginalised livelihoods and experiences of food insecurity in large-scale land investments in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(1), pages 185-205, February.
    5. Nicholas K. Tagliarino & Yakubu A. Bununu & Magbagbeola O. Micheal & Marcello De Maria & Akintobi Olusanmi, 2018. "Compensation for Expropriated Community Farmland in Nigeria: An In-Depth Analysis of the Laws and Practices Related to Land Expropriation for the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-38, February.
    6. Wei He & Pingping Luo & Qianxiu Lyu & Jian Hu, 2024. "How Do the Home Country Regulations Promote the Responsibility for Overseas Farmland Investment?," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Lander, Jennifer & Hatcher, Pascale & Humphreys Bebbington, Denise & Bebbington, Anthony & Banks, Glenn, 2021. "Troubling the idealised pageantry of extractive conflicts: Comparative insights on authority and claim-making from Papua New Guinea, Mongolia and El Salvador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    8. Viesturs Jānis & Auziņš Armands & Štaube Tatjana, 2017. "Arguments Used for Restricting International Real Property Transactions: Case Study of Latvia," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 62-75, November.
    9. Colin Filer & Sango Mahanty & Lesley Potter, 2020. "The FPIC Principle Meets Land Struggles in Cambodia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Gargule A. Achiba, 2019. "Navigating Contested Winds: Development Visions and Anti-Politics of Wind Energy in Northern Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-29, January.
    11. Torsten Menge, 2019. "How Far Does the European Union Reach? Foreign Land Acquisitions and the Boundaries of Political Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Dell'Angelo, Jampel & Rulli, Maria Cristina & D'Odorico, Paolo, 2018. "The Global Water Grabbing Syndrome," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 276-285.
    13. Dell'Angelo, Jampel & Navas, Grettel & Witteman, Marga & D'Alisa, Giacomo & Scheidel, Arnim & Temper, Leah, 2021. "Commons grabbing and agribusiness: Violence, resistance and social mobilization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    14. Gertz, Geoffrey & Jandhyala, Srividya & Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard, 2018. "Legalization, diplomacy, and development: Do investment treaties de-politicize investment disputes?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 239-252.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:34:y:2013:i:9:p:1605-1629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.