IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v29y2014i5p461-470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TOD and Multi-modal Public Transport

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Mees

Abstract

This article considers the role of transit-oriented development (TOD) in genuinely multi-modal public transport systems. In systems of this kind, railway stations are major interchange points with street-based public transport, which is frequently the dominant mode for station access. In such cases, TOD takes advantage of the very high level of accessibility provided by both the rail service and on-street feeder modes, in contrast with walk-on systems, where TOD is seen mainly as a way of expanding the number of walk-on patrons. Examples of both types of system are presented, including details of modal split for station access, and the importance of TOD in generating patronage is considered. The consequences for TOD planning and design are discussed, including trade-offs between park-and-ride patronage and TOD-generated patronage, and between commercial and transport benefits from TOD.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Mees, 2014. "TOD and Multi-modal Public Transport," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 461-470, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:29:y:2014:i:5:p:461-470
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2014.977633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2014.977633
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2014.977633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. McGreevy, Michael & Harris, Patrick & Delany-Crowe, Toni & Fisher, Matt & Sainsbury, Peter & Baum, Fran, 2019. "Can health and health equity be advanced by urban planning strategies designed to advance global competitiveness? Lessons from two Australian case studies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. McGreevy, Michael & Harris, Patrick & Delaney-Crowe, Toni & Fisher, Matt & Sainsbury, Peter & Riley, Emily & Baum, Fran, 2020. "How well do Australian government urban planning policies respond to the social determinants of health and health equity?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:29:y:2014:i:5:p:461-470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.