IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cpprxx/v28y2013i1p45-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Contractualism, the Privatization of the Welfare State, and the Barriers to Open Source Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Raco

Abstract

This paper argues that the UK government's Open Source Planning reforms are founded on a caricatured vision of state-society relationships. Simple binaries are deployed that present political power as a zero-sum game with 'communities' on the one side and state 'bureaucracies' on the other. There has been little recognition of the complex public-private sector entanglements left by the previous Labour government and the power of the 'new contractualism' in shaping the provision and ownership of welfare services and assets. The paper assesses the legacies of privatization under Labour and the structural limits that contracts and private financing now put on the governance and management of the welfare state and the planning system. It contends that the principle sources of state power and accountability that underpinned the post-war settlement are being eroded. Paradoxically, this will not devolve power to local communities and citizens but create new forms of distancing and disempowerment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Raco, 2013. "The New Contractualism, the Privatization of the Welfare State, and the Barriers to Open Source Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 45-64, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:45-64
    DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.694306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02697459.2012.694306
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02697459.2012.694306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Hellowell & Allyson M. Pollock, 2009. "The Private Financing Of Nhs Hospitals: Politics, Policy And Practice," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 13-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. EW Stapper & M Van der Veen & LB Janssen-Jansen, 2020. "Consultants as intermediaries: Their perceptions on citizen involvement in urban development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(1), pages 60-78, February.
    2. John Harrison & Michael Hoyler, 2014. "Governing the new metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2249-2266, August.
    3. Chris Gibson & Crystal Legacy & Dallas Rogers, 2023. "Deal-making, elite networks and public–private hybridisation: More-than-neoliberal urban governance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 183-199, January.
    4. Martijn van den Hurk & Marlies Hueskes, 2017. "Beyond the financial logic: Realizing valuable outcomes in public–private partnerships in Flanders and Ontario," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(5), pages 784-808, August.
    5. Mayra Mosciaro & Alvaro Pereira, 2019. "Reinforcing uneven development: The financialisation of Brazilian urban redevelopment projects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(10), pages 2160-2178, August.
    6. Tuna TaÅŸan-Kok & Rob Atkinson & Maria Lucia Refinetti Martins, 2021. "Hybrid contractual landscapes of governance: Generation of fragmented regimes of public accountability through urban regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(2), pages 371-392, March.
    7. Fatmir Haskaj, 2021. "(Community) garden in the city: Conspicuous labor and gentrification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 1051-1075, August.
    8. Wilhelmus (Michiel) Stapper, Everardus, 2021. "Contracting with citizens: How residents in Hamburg and New York negotiated development agreements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Martijn van den Hurk & Tuna Tasan-Kok, 2020. "Contractual arrangements and entrepreneurial governance: Flexibility and leeway in urban regeneration projects," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3217-3235, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alonso, José M. & Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2015. "The impact of New Public Management on efficiency: An analysis of Madrid's hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 333-340.
    2. Christine André & Philippe Batifoulier & Mariana Jansen-Ferreira, 2016. "Privatisation de la santé en Europe. Un outil de classification des réformes," Working Papers hal-01256505, HAL.
    3. Mariateresa Torchia & Andrea Calabrò, 2018. "Increasing the Governance Standards of Public-Private Partnerships in Healthcare. Evidence from Italy," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 93-110, March.
    4. Graeme A. Hodge, 2010. "Reviewing Public–Private Partnerships: Some Thoughts on Evaluation," Chapters, in: Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Tony Bovaird, 2010. "A Brief Intellectual History of the Public–Private Partnership Movement," Chapters, in: Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. José-Ignacio Antón & Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo & Enrique Fernández Macías & Jesús Rivera, 2014. "Effects of health care decentralization in Spain from a citizens’ perspective," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(4), pages 411-431, May.
    7. Rui Sousa Monteiro, 2010. "Risk Management," Chapters, in: Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Christine André & Philippe Batifoulier & Mariana Jansen-Ferreira, 2016. "Privatisation de la santé en Europe. Un outil de classification des réformes," CEPN Working Papers hal-01256505, HAL.
    9. David Parker & Catarina Figueira, 2010. "PPPs in Developed and Developing Economies: What Lessons can be Learned?," Chapters, in: Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve & Anthony E. Boardman (ed.), International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 23, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cpprxx:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:45-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cppr20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.