IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v17y1999i2p133-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The missing arguments of lean construction

Author

Listed:
  • S. D. Green

Abstract

The emerging concept of lean construction is concerned with the application of lean thinking to the construction industry. The ideas of lean thinking seem set to dominate the UK construction industry's quest to improve quality and efficiency. However, the current debate is based on a highly selective interpretation of the available literature. The extent to which the Japanese model of lean production is applicable in Western contexts remains hotly debated. An extensive body of critical opinion equates the Japanese model of lean production with technocratic totalitarianism. Whilst the claims of productivity achievements in Japanese manufacturing transplants are impressive, the rhetoric of flexibility, quality and teamwork too often translates in practice to control, exploitation and surveillance. Furthermore, it cannot be taken for granted that any increases in productivity necessarily serve the interests of the end customer. The current agenda for the implementation of lean thinking in the UK construction industry notably ignores the extensive critical literature on lean production. In the absence of a more balanced research agenda, there is a danger that dogma rather than a balanced appraisal of the available evidence will drive construction policy.

Suggested Citation

  • S. D. Green, 1999. "The missing arguments of lean construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 133-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:133-137
    DOI: 10.1080/014461999371637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/014461999371637
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/014461999371637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arviga Bigwanto & Naniek Widayati & Mochamad Agung Wibowo & Endah Murtiana Sari, 2024. "Lean Construction: A Sustainability Operation for Government Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Rob Shields & Kevin West, 2003. "Innovation in clean-room construction: a case study of co-operation between firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 337-344.
    3. Janghwan Kim & Jeeyoung Lim & Hyoung-Chul Lim & Dae Young Kim, 2022. "Improving Sustainable Project Success Strategies Focused on Cost and Schedule for Electrical Construction Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    5. Arviga Bigwanto & Naniek Widayati & Mochamad Agung Wibowo & Endah Murtiana Sari, 2024. "Key Performance Indicators (KPI) to Measure Effectiveness of Lean Construction in Indonesian Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Mohammadsoroush Tafazzoli & Ehsan Mousavi & Sharareh Kermanshachi, 2020. "Opportunities and Challenges of Green-Lean: An Integrated System for Sustainable Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:17:y:1999:i:2:p:133-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.