IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v44y2013i5p534-550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring community development: what have we learned?

Author

Listed:
  • Andy S. Blanke
  • Norman Walzer

Abstract

Since the 1960s, community development organizations in the public and nonprofit sectors have become increasingly conscious of the impact of their work in light of finite financial resources and a growing range of policy concerns. This article briefly reviews the history of outcome measurement in community development organizations and describes innovative and emerging measurement practices used to improve public policy. It also outlines key ingredients in successful measurement systems, especially the importance of linking the measures to the strategic planning process. Two prevalent models of outcome measurement are described: universal measures where quantitative data are used to assess progress toward goals common to many communities and contingent measures where qualitative data indicate progress toward goals unique to one community. Common themes among the measurement practices include technical assistance provided by national or regional grantors, a triple bottom line measurement focus, and reduction of measurement cost through secondary data or inexpensive case study methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy S. Blanke & Norman Walzer, 2013. "Measuring community development: what have we learned?," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 534-550, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:44:y:2013:i:5:p:534-550
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2013.852595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2013.852595
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2013.852595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Burd-Sharps & Patrick Guyer & Kristen Lewis, 2011. "Metrics matter: A human development approach to measuring social impact," Community Development Innovation Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue 02, pages 26-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cynthia McPherson Frantz & Ifunanya Ezimora & John E. Petersen & Alexandria Edminster & Md Rumi Shammin & Yunzhang Chi, 2024. "Measuring Social Dimensions of Sustainability at the Community Level: An Illustrative but Cautionary Tale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-36, May.
    2. Sabine O’Hara & Golnar Ahmadi & Midas Hampton & Konyka Dunson, 2023. "Telling Our Story—A Community-Based Meso-Level Approach to Sustainable Community Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangping Jia, 2020. "Priming the pump of impact entrepreneurship and social finance in China," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1293-1311, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:44:y:2013:i:5:p:534-550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.