IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjsbxx/v22y2020i1p84-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Challenged Statehood to Democratic Civil-Military Relations: Defence Reform in Montenegro

Author

Listed:
  • Danijela Dudley

Abstract

After gaining independence in 2006, Montenegro succeeded in establishing democratic civilian control over its armed forces in a short period of time, earning membership in NATO’s Partnership for Peace Program in 2006, Membership Action Plan in 2009, and NATO in 2017. This essay evaluates this swift process of defense reform in Montenegro and argues that such successful establishment of democratic civil-military relations was only possible because the 2006 referendum on independence settled the question of statehood and removed it from the political agenda. The same level of success was not possible in the prior union of Serbia and Montenegro, because Montenegro’s and Kosovo’s independence aspirations generated uncertainty regarding the country’s future and created incentives to maintain non-democratic civil-military relations, even as the country was undergoing democratic reforms in other areas. Once the question of statehood was settled, the new state was able to reform its defense sector and establish democratic control over its armed forces with unusual speed.

Suggested Citation

  • Danijela Dudley, 2020. "From Challenged Statehood to Democratic Civil-Military Relations: Defence Reform in Montenegro," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 84-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:22:y:2020:i:1:p:84-102
    DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2020.1715667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19448953.2020.1715667
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19448953.2020.1715667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:22:y:2020:i:1:p:84-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjsb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.