IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjsbxx/v21y2019i1p74-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Serbian Diaspora’s Political Views: A Study on the 2017 Serbian Presidential Election

Author

Listed:
  • Tena Prelec

Abstract

Members of the Serbian diaspora, especially those vocal in representing their home country’s views, have previously been regarded as leaning towards nationalistic stances. The results of recent elections, however, indicate that today a rather different situation might be present. This study confirms this indication. The analysis sheds light on the political views of Serbian citizens abroad, discussing the results of two surveys conducted around the 2017 Serbian presidential elections. Three main sets of findings concerning the attitudes of the ‘active diaspora’ (diaspora members who took part, or wanted to take part, in the voting process) are outlined. First, there is a decisive rejection of the course the country has taken. Second, it is shown that concerns about governance top by far geopolitical issues. Finally, respondents have highlighted a wide-ranging set of issues concerning the voting procedure, which have hindered their ability to participate in the vote. Here they are used as a basis to formulate recommendations for a better electoral process for the diaspora. The overall findings indicate that Serbia’s active diaspora might have the potential to participate more vigorously in the political life of the country and that, if emboldened, its weight in future elections could be much higher.

Suggested Citation

  • Tena Prelec, 2019. "The Serbian Diaspora’s Political Views: A Study on the 2017 Serbian Presidential Election," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 74-89, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:21:y:2019:i:1:p:74-89
    DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2018.1532687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19448953.2018.1532687
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19448953.2018.1532687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:21:y:2019:i:1:p:74-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjsb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.