IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v20y2016i1p10-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Propositions for more just urban public spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Setha Low
  • Kurt Iveson

Abstract

Across a diverse range of urban geographical contexts, the provision and governance of public spaces frequently generates conflicts of varying intensity involving urban inhabitants and urban authorities. A clear moral and philosophically based argument and evaluative framework is necessary for both critiquing and informing the positions that are taken in public space disputes. In this paper, we develop a model of socially just public space that could inform analysis of, and interventions in, these conflicts. In dialogue with the literatures on urban public space and on social and spatial justice, we offer five propositions about what makes for more just public space. The five propositions concern distributive justice, recognition, interactional justice and encounter, care and repair, and procedural justice. The application of these five propositions is exemplified through brief reflections on the politics of the street in New York City, and ‘broken windows’ style policing of graffiti.

Suggested Citation

  • Setha Low & Kurt Iveson, 2016. "Propositions for more just urban public spaces," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 10-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:20:y:2016:i:1:p:10-31
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1128679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2015.1128679
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2015.1128679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zelin Zhang & Xiaomin Tang & Yun Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of the Intergenerational Equity of Public Open Space in Old Communities: A Case Study of Caoyang New Village in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Ibrahim Z. Bahreldin, 2020. "Beyond the Sit-In: Public Space Production and Appropriation in Sudan’s December Revolution, 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Shuran Li & Chengwei Wang & Liying Rong & Shiqi Zhou & Zhiqiang Wu, 2024. "Understanding How People Perceive and Interact with Public Space through Social Media Big Data: A Case Study of Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-27, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:20:y:2016:i:1:p:10-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.