IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cijwxx/v32y2016i4p650-673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public acceptance and perceptions of alternative water sources: a comparative study in nine locations

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Hurlimann
  • Sara Dolnicar

Abstract

Public acceptance of recycled water, desalinated water and rainwater is compared across nine international locations: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, Norway and United States (specifically in Los Angeles). An online study was conducted in 2012, with 200 participants recruited to be representative of their respective location (1800 in total). The study investigated participants’ intended use of and perceptions of alternative water sources. Results indicate that respondents clearly differentiate between alternative water sources. Water source preference varied between water use purposes. Significant differences were found between locations in the percentage of respondents willing to use alternative water sources. Additionally the study found significant differences across locations in perceptions held of five water sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Hurlimann & Sara Dolnicar, 2016. "Public acceptance and perceptions of alternative water sources: a comparative study in nine locations," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 650-673, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cijwxx:v:32:y:2016:i:4:p:650-673
    DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1143350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07900627.2016.1143350
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07900627.2016.1143350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mariana Marchioni & Anita Raimondi & Maria Gloria Chiano & Umberto Sanfilippo & Stefano Mambretti & Gianfranco Becciu, 2023. "Costs-benefit Analysis for the use of Shallow Groundwater as non-conventional Water Resource," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(5), pages 2125-2142, March.
    2. Savchenko, Olesya M. & Kecinski, Maik & Li, Tongzhe & Messer, Kent D. & Xu, Huidong, 2018. "Fresh foods irrigated with recycled water: A framed field experiment on consumer responses," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 103-112.
    3. Shufen GUO & Zhifang Wu & Ludi Wen, 2022. "Urban Residents’ Acceptance Intention to Use Recycled Stormwater—An Examination of Values, Altruism, Social and Cultural Norms, and Perceived Health Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Furlong, Casey & Jegatheesan, Jega & Currell, Matthew & Iyer-Raniga, Usha & Khan, Tehmina & Ball, Andrew S., 2019. "Is the global public willing to drink recycled water? A review for researchers and practitioners," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 53-61.
    5. Samantha Redman & Kerri Jean Ormerod & Scott Kelley, 2019. "Reclaiming Suburbia: Differences in Local Identity and Public Perceptions of Potable Water Reuse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Sean F. Ellis & Maik Kecinski & Kent D. Messer & Clive Lipchin, 2022. "Consumer perceptions after long‐term use of alternative irrigation water: A field experiment in Israel," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 1003-1020, June.
    7. Cristina Gómez-Román & Luisa Lima & Sergio Vila-Tojo & Andrea Correa-Chica & Juan Lema & José-Manuel Sabucedo, 2020. "“Who Cares?”: The Acceptance of Decentralized Wastewater Systems in Regions without Water Problems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Hanliang Fu & Zhaoxing Li & Zhijian Liu & Zelin Wang, 2018. "Research on Big Data Digging of Hot Topics about Recycled Water Use on Micro-Blog Based on Particle Swarm Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Ricart, Sandra & Rico, Antonio M., 2019. "Assessing technical and social driving factors of water reuse in agriculture: A review on risks, regulation and the yuck factor," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 426-439.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cijwxx:v:32:y:2016:i:4:p:650-673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cijw20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.