IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v25y2017i2p163-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Alternative for Germany’s radicalization in historical-comparative perspective

Author

Listed:
  • David F. Patton

Abstract

This article chronicles the Alternative for Germany’s (AfD) rightward repositioning and compares it with the programmatic development of three post-war German parties on the ideological wings. By highlighting factors that tilt the balance of power away from moderate reformers towards hardliners, this comparative analysis sheds light on the conditions that lead a relatively successful party on the ideological wings, such as the AfD, to radicalize its programme. Four variables stand out: whether party hardliners take the blame for the recent election loss; whether they offer a convincing programmatic and strategic alternative to the reformers; whether changes in party composition strengthen hardliners; and whether external factors enhance their weight within the party. The essay concludes that the AfD’s radicalization was unusual, but not exceptional. It is however too early to conclude that the Federal Republic’s distinctive institutions and political culture no longer impose significant costs on parties that shift their programmes away from the centre.

Suggested Citation

  • David F. Patton, 2017. "The Alternative for Germany’s radicalization in historical-comparative perspective," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 163-180, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:25:y:2017:i:2:p:163-180
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2017.1399512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2017.1399512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2017.1399512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:25:y:2017:i:2:p:163-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.