IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v23y2015i2-3p181-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing International Dimensions of Revolutionary Situations: The cases of Egypt 2011 and Turkey 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Derya Göçer Akder
  • Zelal Özdemir

Abstract

This paper will look at the lessons we can draw from recent uprisings in the Middle East with regard to the theories of revolutions. Within the wider theoretical debate of the causes, processes and outcomes of revolutions the paper will focus on the international political dimensions of the revolutionary situations as distinct from the revolutionary outcomes. The article will disentangle and conceptualize the international politics surrounding these revolutionary situations. The paper will propose a framework of analysis of international politics in revolutionary situations by drawing not only on the Egyptian Uprising but also on the Gezi Uprising in Turkey in the same region. We argue that the role of the international should be neither downplayed nor exaggerated at the expense of domestic agency, and we need to combine structural and agential elements as we build a conjunctional understanding of international factors in revolutionary situations. In studying a region where the involvement of international factors during periods of domestic political change is complex, we need the same complexity in our frameworks of analysis and such frameworks will contribute to comparative studies of revolutionary situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Derya Göçer Akder & Zelal Özdemir, 2015. "Comparing International Dimensions of Revolutionary Situations: The cases of Egypt 2011 and Turkey 2013," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2-3), pages 181-194, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:23:y:2015:i:2-3:p:181-194
    DOI: 10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116791
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:23:y:2015:i:2-3:p:181-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.