IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v23y2015i2-3p151-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Rights as Myth and History: Between the Revolutions of 1989 and the Arab Spring

Author

Listed:
  • Ned Richardson-Little

Abstract

Since the end of state socialism in Eastern Europe, the revolutions of 1989 have become a central element in the mythology of human rights. Human rights are portrayed as a catalyst, alighting a revolutionary ethos within those living in the Eastern Bloc. By depicting 1989 as the result of a mass moral epiphany regarding universal human rights, such narratives naturalize and depoliticize the collapse of state socialism. While the discourse of human rights was important in unifying dissident groups, it had also been used to by socialist states to legitimize dictatorial rule. During the Arab Spring, international commentators and local actors invoked this mythological version of 1989 to declare that a similar awakening was once again taking place and that human rights were sure to triumph over dictatorship. The example of Egypt appeared to mirror that of 1989 with mass demonstrations for human rights, prompting optimism that a similar revolutionary change was inevitable. Instead, the successful reassertion of military dictatorship has been legitimized in the name of protecting human rights. In viewing the end of state socialism as the result of the proliferation of human rights consciousness, the mythology of 1989 creates a tragically flawed model for reform and revolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ned Richardson-Little, 2015. "Human Rights as Myth and History: Between the Revolutions of 1989 and the Arab Spring," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2-3), pages 151-166, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:23:y:2015:i:2-3:p:151-166
    DOI: 10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116788
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:23:y:2015:i:2-3:p:151-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.