IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdanxx/v40y2024i4p559-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-offs and prisoner of war policy under renewed great power tension

Author

Listed:
  • Spencer L. Willardson

Abstract

Prisoners of War are a fact of war and must be accounted for legally, operationally, and strategically. The recent wars fought by the US have been characterised by detainee operations for combatants without soldier status. This article outlines the issues of detention and POWs to highlight the importance of this issue as a potential factor in winning armed conflict. The argument is that the US strategy is pivoting to competition, and preparation for potential war with China. As such, POW considerations need to be part of strategic and military planning. While the US has a robust doctrine for planning for POW operations under the laws of war, the US has historically struggled to exploit effectively and advantageously POWs for victory. Common trade-offs and considerations associated with detention policy are outlined. The article concludes with a call to make detention operations, with all that entails, part of the strategic conversation regarding great power competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Spencer L. Willardson, 2024. "Trade-offs and prisoner of war policy under renewed great power tension," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 559-575, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:40:y:2024:i:4:p:559-575
    DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2024.2407664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2024.2407664
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14751798.2024.2407664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:40:y:2024:i:4:p:559-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.