IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdanxx/v34y2018i3p211-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Serbian defence institution: the need for clear policy guidance to improve the Serbian defence planning, management, and command processes

Author

Listed:
  • Blažo M. Radović

Abstract

The uncritical layering of western liberal defence governance norms and concepts on top of existing legacy concepts has impeded achieving coherent military capabilities and capacities when Serbia’s political and military leadership tried to reform the defence system using Western benchmarking principles and Western countries’ best practices. The process of this change has been more valuable than its actual output, as defined by increased capabilities. Such outcomes should be reflective of policy guidance, and can be thought of as closing the trinity loop of a defence planning system: plans, money and execution. This article addresses two key functional areas of the Serbian defence institution. First, it assesses the current state of defence planning to discern its strengths and weaknesses to ascertain if plans are tied to financial decision-making. Second, a full examination of current Serbian defence management is conducted to discern whether weaknesses exist that distract from producing operational capabilities. Both areas are analyzed thoroughly and some solutions for change are proposed. Also, the article analyzes the appearance of two negative phenomena in the planning process – economization and managerialism.

Suggested Citation

  • Blažo M. Radović, 2018. "The Serbian defence institution: the need for clear policy guidance to improve the Serbian defence planning, management, and command processes," Defense & Security Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 211-231, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:34:y:2018:i:3:p:211-231
    DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2018.1500753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14751798.2018.1500753
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14751798.2018.1500753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdanxx:v:34:y:2018:i:3:p:211-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.