IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v52y2020i60p6482-6497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact assessment of agriculture, energy and water on CO2 emissions in China: untangling the differences between major and non-major grain-producing areas

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyi Wang
  • Xiucheng Dong
  • Hui Qiao
  • Kangyin Dong

Abstract

Due to the use of abundant fossil and non-fossil fuels, the agricultural sector has contributed to large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in China. Meanwhile, the agricultural sector is the largest consumer of water in China. To investigate the effects of agricultural output, energy consumption and water use on CO2 emissions in China, a panel of 30 provinces for 2004–2017 is utilized. Also, to control the potential endogeneity, the orthogonal-difference Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) is used as the benchmark estimation method. Moreover, the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (D-H) panel causality test is employed to discover the causal relations among all the variables. Considering the differences in various agricultural areas in China, the 30 provinces are further divided into major and non-major grain-producing areas. The empirical results indicate that CO2 emission is responsive to economic growth, energy consumption, agricultural output and water use with positive elasticities in China. However, at the regional level, agricultural output only has significant impact on CO2 emissions in major grain-producing areas. Also, major and non-major grain-producing areas provide mixed directionality of causality among the variables. Finally, several policy implications are highlighted for the Chinese government with respect to mitigating CO2 emissions and promoting growth in the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyi Wang & Xiucheng Dong & Hui Qiao & Kangyin Dong, 2020. "Impact assessment of agriculture, energy and water on CO2 emissions in China: untangling the differences between major and non-major grain-producing areas," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(60), pages 6482-6497, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:60:p:6482-6497
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1796920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2020.1796920
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2020.1796920?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan, Xiao & Zhang, Jinlong & Shi, Jing & Wang, Jiachen, 2024. "What can green finance do for high-quality agricultural development? Fresh insights from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Koçak, Emrah & Önderol, Seyit & Khan, Kamran, 2021. "Structural change, modernization, total factor productivity, and natural resources sustainability: An assessment with quantile and non-quantile estimators," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Ayhan Orhan & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Sema Yılmaz Genç & Dervis Kirikkaleli, 2021. "Investigating the Linkage between Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability in India: Do Agriculture and Trade Openness Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Ojonugwa Usman & Andrew Adewale Alola & George N. Ike, 2021. "Modelling the effect of energy consumption on different environmental indicators in the United States: The role of financial development and renewable energy innovations," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(4), pages 441-463, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:60:p:6482-6497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.