IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v4y1997i10p635-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portfolio managers versus the darts: evidence from the Wall Street Journal's Dartboard Column

Author

Listed:
  • Allen Atkins
  • James Sundali

Abstract

The possibility that professional stock analysts could be outperformed by throwing darts at the stock listing page has intrigued stock market enthusiasts for years. In this study, we examine the results from the Wall Street Journal's Investment Dartboard Columns and find that the experts outperform the darts by a wide margin and outperform five different market indices by a positive but statistically insignificant amount.

Suggested Citation

  • Allen Atkins & James Sundali, 1997. "Portfolio managers versus the darts: evidence from the Wall Street Journal's Dartboard Column," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(10), pages 635-637.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:4:y:1997:i:10:p:635-637
    DOI: 10.1080/758533290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/758533290&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/758533290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mayers, David & Rice, Edward M., 1979. "Measuring portfolio performance and the empirical content of asset pricing models," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 3-28, March.
    2. Liu, Pu & Smith, Stanley D. & Syed, Azmat A., 1990. "Stock Price Reactions to The Wall Street Journal's Securities Recommendations," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 399-410, September.
    3. Chen, Nai-fu & Copeland, Thomas E. & Mayers, David, 1987. "A Comparison of Single and Multifactor Portfolio Performance Methodologies (formerly WP #13-83)," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt1tw5w5rs, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    4. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J & Grossman, Seth, 1986. "Discrete Expectational Data and Portfolio Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(3), pages 699-713, July.
    5. Barber, Brad M. & Loeffler, Douglas, 1993. "The “Dartboard” Column: Second-Hand Information and Price Pressure," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 273-284, June.
    6. Chen, Nai-Fu & Copeland, Thomas E. & Mayers, David, 1987. "A Comparison of Single and Multifactor Portfolio Performance Methodologies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 401-417, December.
    7. Kalman J. Cohen & Jerry A. Pogue, 1968. "Some Comments Concerning Mutual Fund Versus Random Portfolio Performance," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41, pages 180-180.
    8. Brown, Stephen J. & Warner, Jerold B., 1980. "Measuring security price performance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 205-258, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caliendo, Frank & Huang, Kevin X.D., 2008. "Overconfidence and consumption over the life cycle," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1347-1369, December.
    2. Frank Caliendo & Kevin X. D. Huang, 2007. "Overconfidence in financial markets and consumption over the life cycle," Working Papers 07-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bing Xiang, 1993. "The Choice of Return†Generating Models and Cross†Sectional Dependence in Event Studies," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 365-394, March.
    2. Philipp M. Schlumpf & Markus M. Schmid & Heinz Zimmermann, 2008. "The First‐ and Second‐Hand Effect of Analysts' Stock Recommendations: Evidence from the Swiss Stock Market," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 962-988, November.
    3. Neumann, John J. & Kenny, Peppi M., 2007. "Does Mad Money make the market go mad," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 602-615, December.
    4. Enrico Maria Cervellati & Riccardo Ferretti & Pierpaolo Pattitoni, 2014. "Market reaction to second-hand news: inside the attention-grabbing hypothesis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(10), pages 1108-1121, April.
    5. Zhang, Yuzhao & Liu, Haifei, 2021. "Stock market reactions to social media: Evidence from WeChat recommendations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    6. Zhang, Yongjie & Song, Weixin & Shen, Dehua & Zhang, Wei, 2016. "Market reaction to internet news: Information diffusion and price pressure," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 43-49.
    7. Erik R. Lidén, 2007. "Swedish Stock Recommendations: Information Content or Price Pressure?," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 11(3-4), pages 253-285, September.
    8. Enrico Maria Cervellati & Riccardo Ferretti & Pierpaolo Pattitoni, 2011. "Market Reaction to Second-Hand News: Attention Grabbing or Information Dissemination," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0024, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    9. Lidén, Erik R., 2003. "Swedish Stock Recommendations: Information Content or Price Pressure?," Working Papers in Economics 98, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, revised 19 Nov 2004.
    10. Szymon Okoń, 2012. "Investor Reaction to Mandatory Offers on the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 6(2), June.
    11. Roberto Casarin & Flaminio Squazzoni, 2012. "Financial press and stock markets in times of crisis," Working Papers 2012_04, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    12. Marina Balboa & J. Carlos Gómez‐Sala & Germán López‐Espinosa, 2009. "The Value of Adjusting the Bias in Recommendations: International Evidence," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 15(1), pages 208-230, January.
    13. Tsung-Yu Hsieh & Tsai-Yin Lin & Fangjhy Li & Yi-Ting Huang, 2023. "Analyst’s Target Price Revision and Dealer’s Trading Behavior Analysis: Evidence from Taiwanese Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-9, February.
    14. Jagjeev Dosanjh, 2017. "Exchange Initiatives and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Australian Securities Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2017, January-A.
    15. Julio A. Crego, 2017. "Does Public News Decrease Information Asymmetries? Evidence from the Weekly Petroleum Status Report," Working Papers wp2017_1714, CEMFI.
    16. Albert, Robert Jr. & Smaby, Timothy R., 1996. "Market response to analyst recommendations in the "dartboard" column: the information and price-pressure effects," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 59-74.
    17. Adria Pop & Jan Sporer & Siegfried Handschuh, 2024. "The Structure of Financial Equity Research Reports -- Identification of the Most Frequently Asked Questions in Financial Analyst Reports to Automate Equity Research Using Llama 3 and GPT-4," Papers 2407.18327, arXiv.org.
    18. Jean†Marc Suret & Jean†François L'Her, 1990. "La réaction des titres canadiens aux changements dans les prévisions de bénéfices comptables," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 347-377, September.
    19. repec:uts:finphd:34 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Jean†François L'Her & Jean†Marc Suret, 1991. "The reaction of Canadian securities to revisions of earnings forecasts," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 378-406, March.
    21. Ferreira, Eurico J. & Smith, Stanley D., 1999. "Stock price reactions to recommendations in the Wall Street Journal "Small Stock Focus" column," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 379-389.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:4:y:1997:i:10:p:635-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.