IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apbizr/v30y2024i3p596-612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Japan’s ‘consensual’ variety of digital capitalism and its global relevance

Author

Listed:
  • Harald Kümmerle
  • Franz Waldenberger

Abstract

Data regulation has been framed as a global battle between the market-driven US, the state-driven Chinese, and the rights-driven EU models. We argue that Japan is pursuing a distinct fourth, consensus-driven approach. It is based on soft regulation and aims at striking a balance between privacy concerns and commercial and public interests in the usage of data. The concept of consensus is deeply rooted in Japan’s legal tradition. Its application to data regulation is apparent in the domestic certification scheme for information banks and the international initiative ‘Data Free Flow with Trust’. We also show that Japan’s COVID-19 countermeasures relied on data strategies fully compatible with its consensual regulatory model. By combining rights-driven and market-driven aspects, Japan can potentially mediate between the EU and the US regimes. Japan’s approach also offers an attractive alternative for countries that do not want to pick a side in the Sino-American competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Harald Kümmerle & Franz Waldenberger, 2024. "Japan’s ‘consensual’ variety of digital capitalism and its global relevance," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 596-612, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:596-612
    DOI: 10.1080/13602381.2024.2320553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13602381.2024.2320553
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13602381.2024.2320553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:30:y:2024:i:3:p:596-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FAPB20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.