IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apbizr/v22y2016i3p422-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Confucian business ethics in Korea: pre-modern welfare state

Author

Listed:
  • Sangsoon Kang
  • Joohee Choi

Abstract

From the start, the Choseon state had vigorously engaged in relieving people’s famine by establishing a granary system dedicated to that purpose. The reason was its allegiance to the Confucian minben ideal. As the granary system proved ineffective, however, it adopted a new taxation/granary system that relied much on market exchange. Paradoxically, the new system greatly enhanced the importance of state granary system as a means of implementing its redistributive policies, the role of market exchange in that process remaining subordinate. The reinforced state granary system was to perform multiple, potentially conflicting, functions and was allowed to develop a strong tendency towards path dependence and to incur high transaction costs behind such a development lay ideological and institutional factors. The Choseon state’s commitment to a physiocratic ideal and to Confucianism called for the creation and maintenance of the prodigious granary system. However, the institutional shortcomings built into the organization that was supposed to manage the system finally led the people to question the legitimacy not only of the system but even of the state itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangsoon Kang & Joohee Choi, 2016. "Confucian business ethics in Korea: pre-modern welfare state," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 422-438, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:22:y:2016:i:3:p:422-438
    DOI: 10.1080/13602381.2015.1129771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13602381.2015.1129771
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13602381.2015.1129771?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apbizr:v:22:y:2016:i:3:p:422-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FAPB20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.