IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v72y2018i2p199-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating the Calculation of the Efficient Score Using Symbolic Computing

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander B. Sibley
  • Zhiguo Li
  • Yu Jiang
  • Yi-Ju Li
  • Cliburn Chan
  • Andrew Allen
  • Kouros Owzar

Abstract

The score statistic continues to be a fundamental tool for statistical inference. In the analysis of data from high-throughput genomic assays, inference on the basis of the score usually enjoys greater stability, considerably higher computational efficiency, and lends itself more readily to the use of resampling methods than the asymptotically equivalent Wald or likelihood ratio tests. The score function often depends on a set of unknown nuisance parameters which have to be replaced by estimators, but can be improved by calculating the efficient score, which accounts for the variability induced by estimating these parameters. Manual derivation of the efficient score is tedious and error-prone, so we illustrate using computer algebra to facilitate this derivation. We demonstrate this process within the context of a standard example from genetic association analyses, though the techniques shown here could be applied to any derivation, and have a place in the toolbox of any modern statistician. We further show how the resulting symbolic expressions can be readily ported to compiled languages, to develop fast numerical algorithms for high-throughput genomic analysis. We conclude by considering extensions of this approach. The code featured in this report is available online as part of the supplementary material.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander B. Sibley & Zhiguo Li & Yu Jiang & Yi-Ju Li & Cliburn Chan & Andrew Allen & Kouros Owzar, 2018. "Facilitating the Calculation of the Efficient Score Using Symbolic Computing," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 199-205, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:2:p:199-205
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2017.1392361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2017.1392361
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2017.1392361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Freedman, David A., 2007. "How Can the Score Test Be Inconsistent?," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 61, pages 291-295, November.
    2. Nicholas J. Horton & Johanna S. Hardin, 2015. "Teaching the Next Generation of Statistics Students to “Think With Data”: Special Issue on Statistics and the Undergraduate Curriculum," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 259-265, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Jon Horton, 2016. "Discussion: Making Progress in a Crowded Market," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 179-181, August.
    2. Constance H. McLaren & Bruce J. McLaren, 2018. "SCOTS: The Searchable Collection of Time Series," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 12-22, September.
    3. Felix Kimtai Kiminyei, 2019. "Empirical Investigation on the Relationship among Kenyan Public Debt, Tax Revenue and Government Expenditure," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 5(1), pages 142-159, March.
    4. Ivan Jericevich & Patrick Chang & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Simulation and estimation of a point-process market-model with a matching engine," Papers 2105.02211, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    5. Lei Jin & Suojin Wang, 2010. "A Model Validation Procedure when Covariate Data are Missing at Random," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(3), pages 403-421, September.
    6. Lavergne, Pascal, 2014. "Model equivalence tests in a parametric framework," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 414-425.
    7. Amy L. Phelps & Kathryn A. Szabat, 2017. "The Current Landscape of Teaching Analytics to Business Students at Institutions of Higher Education: Who is Teaching What?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 155-161, April.
    8. Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda & Cécile Proust-Lima & Jeremy M.G. Taylor & Daniel Commenges, 2010. "Score Test for Conditional Independence Between Longitudinal Outcome and Time to Event Given the Classes in the Joint Latent Class Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 11-19, March.
    9. Roger W. Hoerl & Ronald D. Snee, 2017. "Statistical Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 209-219, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:72:y:2018:i:2:p:199-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.