IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v68y2014i1p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resurrecting the Third Variable: A Critique of Pearl's Causal Analysis of Simpson's Paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy W. Armistead

Abstract

Pearl argued that Simpson's Paradox would not be considered paradoxical but for statisticians' unwillingness to acknowledge the role of causality in resolving an instance of it. He proposed using a causal calculus to determine which set of contradictory findings in an instance of the paradox should be accepted-the aggregated data or the data disaggregated by conditioning on the third variable. Pearl used the example of a hypothetical quasi-experiment to argue that when third variables are not causal, one should not condition on them, and-assuming no other sources of confounding-the aggregated data should be accepted. Pearl was precipitate in his argument that it would be inappropriate to condition on the noncausal third variables in the example. Whether causal or not, third variables can convey critical information about a first-order relationship, study design, and previously unobserved variables. Any conditioning on a nontrivial third variable that produces Simpson's Paradox should be carefully examined before either the aggregated or the disaggregated findings are accepted, regardless of whether the third variable is thought to be causal. In some cases, neither set of data is trustworthy; in others, both convey information of value. Pearl's hypothetical example is used to illustrate this argument.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy W. Armistead, 2014. "Resurrecting the Third Variable: A Critique of Pearl's Causal Analysis of Simpson's Paradox," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(1), pages 1-7, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:1-7
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2013.807750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2013.807750
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2013.807750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wulczyn, Fred, 2020. "Race/ethnicity and running away from foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Swamy, P.A.V.B. & Mehta, J.S. & Tavlas, G.S. & Hall, S.G., 2015. "Two applications of the random coefficient procedure: Correcting for misspecifications in a small area level model and resolving Simpson's paradox," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 93-98.
    3. Aris Spanos, 2021. "Yule–Simpson’s paradox: the probabilistic versus the empirical conundrum," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(2), pages 605-635, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:68:y:2014:i:1:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.