IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v7y2010i3p267-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for the ethical practice of action learning

Author

Listed:
  • Craig Johnson

Abstract

By tradition the action learning community has encouraged an eclectic view of practice. This involves a number of different permutations around a kernel of nebulous ideas. However, the disadvantages of such an open philosophy have never been considered. In particular consumer protection against inauthentic action learning experiences has been overlooked. This paper uses a systems approach to define six core principles of action learning. The framework can be used by participants to decide if they are on a genuine action learning programme. For facilitators it can be adapted or adopted to define the limits of their practice and consider the impact their intervention may have on the participants of their programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Craig Johnson, 2010. "A framework for the ethical practice of action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 267-283, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:3:p:267-283
    DOI: 10.1080/14767333.2010.518373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14767333.2010.518373
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14767333.2010.518373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bob MacKenzie, 2014. "Learning at work in a tiger economy," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 380-385, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:7:y:2010:i:3:p:267-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.