IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v9y2000i4p403-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejoinder: Creative role play and television programme formats as an extreme pedagogical device in serving the 'new economy'?

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Buckmaster
  • Russell Craig

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Buckmaster & Russell Craig, 2000. "Rejoinder: Creative role play and television programme formats as an extreme pedagogical device in serving the 'new economy'?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 403-406.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:403-406
    DOI: 10.1080/09639280010025627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09639280010025627
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09639280010025627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. R. Mathews, 2000. "Commentary on: 'Popular television formats, the student-as-consumer metaphor, acculturation and critical engagement in the teaching of accounting'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 395-398.
    2. Can Simga-Mugan, 2000. "Commentary on: 'Popular television formats, the student-as-consumer metaphor, acculturation and critical engagement in the teaching of accounting'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 399-401.
    3. Dwight Owsen, 2000. "Commentary on: 'Popular television formats, the student-as-consumer metaphor, acculturation and critical engagement in the teaching of accounting'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 389-393.
    4. Natalie Buckmaster & Russell Craig, 2000. "Popular television formats, The student-as-consumer metaphor, acculturation and critical engagement in the teaching of accounting," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 371-387.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chabrak, Nihel & Craig, Russell, 2013. "Student imaginings, cognitive dissonance and critical thinking," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 91-104.
    2. Russell Craig & Joel Amernic, 2002. "Accountability of accounting educators and the rhythm of the university: resistance strategies for postmodern blues," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 121-171.
    3. Dwight Owsen, 2000. "Commentary on: 'Popular television formats, the student-as-consumer metaphor, acculturation and critical engagement in the teaching of accounting'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 389-393.
    4. M. R. Mathews, 2000. "Commentary on: 'Popular television formats, the student-as-consumer metaphor, acculturation and critical engagement in the teaching of accounting'," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 395-398.
    5. Russell Craig, 2010. "Will Compelled Study of Literary Classics Engender Enrichment, Creativity, Curiosity, and Romance in Accounting Students? A Commentary on 'A Role for the Compulsory Study of Literature in Accounting E," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 347-350.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:9:y:2000:i:4:p:403-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.