IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v15y2006i1p25-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A commentary on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”

Author

Listed:
  • Sidney Weil
  • Peter Oyelere

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidney Weil & Peter Oyelere, 2006. "A commentary on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 25-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:15:y:2006:i:1:p:25-28
    DOI: 10.1080/06939280500453064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/06939280500453064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/06939280500453064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph Adler, 2006. "A rejoinder to commentaries on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 35-39.
    2. Ralph Adler, 2006. "Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 3-10.
    3. Schall, Lawrence D & Sundem, Gary L & Geijsbeek, William R, Jr, 1978. "Survey and Analysis of Capital Budgeting Methods," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 281-287, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ralph Adler, 2006. "A rejoinder to commentaries on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 35-39.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catriona Paisey, 2006. "A commentary on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 17-20.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.
    3. Ravi Jagannathan & Iwan Meier, 2002. "Do We Need CAPM for Capital Budgeting?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 31(4), Winter.
    4. Hermes, Niels & Smid, Peter & Yao, Lu, 2007. "Capital budgeting practices: A comparative study of the Netherlands and China," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 630-654, October.
    5. Peter Markovič & Michal Šinský, 2009. "Trends in application of capital budgeting methods for investment projects evaluation," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(1).
    6. Wambach, Achim, 2000. "Payback criterion, hurdle rates and the gain of waiting," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 247-258.
    7. Pereiro, Luis E., 2006. "The practice of investment valuation in emerging markets: Evidence from Argentina," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 160-183, April.
    8. Kereboon Champathed & Chuvej Chansa-ngavej, 2016. "Project Evaluation Trend in Thailand Based on Critical Factors Index," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 6-13.
    9. Chittenden, Francis & Derregia, Mohsen, 2015. "Uncertainty, irreversibility and the use of ‘rules of thumb’ in capital budgeting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 225-236.
    10. Sureka, Riya & Kumar, Satish & Colombage, Sisira & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2022. "Five decades of research on capital budgeting – A systematic review and future research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Mehari Mekonnen Akalu, 2002. "Evaluating the Capacity of Standard Investment Appraisal Methods," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-082/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Mark Freeman & Garry Hobbes, 1991. "Costly Information, Informed Investors and the Use of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques," Working Paper Series 1, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    13. Ralph Adler, 2006. "A rejoinder to commentaries on “Why DCF capital budgeting is bad for business and why business schools should stop teaching it”," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 35-39.
    14. Mendes-da-Silva, Wesley & Saito, Richard, 2014. "Listagem em bolsa induz sofisticação do orçamento de capital," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(5), September.
    15. Harris, Milton & Raviv, Artur, 1998. "Capital budgeting and delegation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 259-289, December.
    16. repec:dgr:rugsom:06e02 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lefley, Frank, 1996. "The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 207-224, July.
    18. Weber, Thomas A., 2014. "On the (non-)equivalence of IRR and NPV," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 25-39.
    19. Giang Truong & Graham Partington & Maurice Peat, 2008. "Cost-of-Capital Estimation and Capital-Budgeting Practice in Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 33(1), pages 95-121, June.
    20. Jack Hirshleifer, 1985. "Investment Decision Criteria," UCLA Economics Working Papers 365, UCLA Department of Economics.
    21. Stephen Decanio, 1994. "Agency and Control Problems in US Corporations: The Case of Energy-efficient Investment Projects," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 105-124.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:15:y:2006:i:1:p:25-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.