IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/globus/v15y2014i2p339-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Insight into Different Stages of Capital Budgeting

Author

Listed:
  • Roopali Batra

    (Roopali Batra, Faculty in Management, Apeejay Institute of Management Technical Campus, Rama Mandi, Jalandhar - 144007, Punjab. E-mail: roopalibatra@rediffmail.com)

  • Satish Verma

    (Satish Verma, Professor, RBI Chair, Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development (CRRID), Sector 19-A, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh - 160019. E-mail: sv_gndu@yahoo.co.in)

Abstract

In today’s highly turbulent and volatile business environment where companies are exposed to a multitude of risks, only globally competitive and professionally managed companies can thrive and grow. In such a competitive environment, the capital budgeting decisions made by a company are critical to a firm’s long-term survival. Is the Indian corporate sector using theoretically sound and sophisticated capital budgeting techniques for decision making purposes? Are the Indian firms adopting risk analysis techniques for handling various risks in investments? These issues have been the focus of research studies over the past so many years. The most prevalent emphasis of previous capital budgeting surveys continues to be mainly on financial analysis and project selection stage of capital budgeting. The article reviews the past capital budgeting survey literature till the year 2012 and brings to light some of the neglected areas of capital budgeting. It is noticed that project definition and cash flow estimation (identification and development) (Stage I), project implementation (Stage III) and project review (post audit and control) (Stage IV) are the specifically neglected areas of the capital budgeting process. Further Indian studies encompassing the overall stages of capital budgeting process still remain relatively unexplored. The main aim of the present study is to not only provide an insight on the past literature, but also explore the CFOs opinions and perceptions about the relative difficulty and significance of different stages of capital budgeting in India, particularly in an era of full-fledged globalization and cutthroat competition, where companies are being exposed to various degrees of risk. The study is based on a primary survey of CFOs of 77 Indian companies listed on Bombay Stock Exchange. The study further endeavours to evaluate the impact of different company related variables of size of capital budget, nature of industry, company age, CEO education and CEO age on the level of difficulty of different stages of capital budgeting.

Suggested Citation

  • Roopali Batra & Satish Verma, 2014. "An Empirical Insight into Different Stages of Capital Budgeting," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 339-362, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:339-362
    DOI: 10.1177/0972150914523588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972150914523588
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972150914523588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petry, Glenn H., 1975. "Effective use of capital budgeting tools," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 57-65, October.
    2. Shveta Singh & P.K. Jain & Surendra S. Yadav, 2012. "Capital budgeting decisions: evidence from India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 96-112, May.
    3. Klammer, Thomas, 1972. "Empirical Evidence of the Adoption of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(3), pages 387-397, July.
    4. Schall, Lawrence D & Sundem, Gary L & Geijsbeek, William R, Jr, 1978. "Survey and Analysis of Capital Budgeting Methods," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 281-287, March.
    5. Neale, C. W., 1994. "Investment post-auditing practices among British and Norwegian companies: A comparative study," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 31-46, March.
    6. Petry, Glenn H., 1975. "Effective use of capital budgeting tools," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 57-65, October.
    7. Scott, David F, Jr & Petty, J William, II, 1984. "Capital Budgeting Practices in Large American Firms: A Retrospective Analysis and Synthesis," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 19(1), pages 111-123, March.
    8. Mao, James C T, 1970. "Survey of Capital Budgeting: Theory and Practice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 349-360, May.
    9. Shveta Singh & P.K. Jain & Surendra S. Yadav, 2012. "Capital budgeting decisions: evidence from India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 96-112, May.
    10. Seema Gupta & P.K. Jain & Surendra S. Yadav, 2011. "Impact of MoU on financial performance of public sector enterprises in India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 263-284, November.
    11. Glen C. Arnold & Panos D. Hatzopoulos, 2000. "The Theory-Practice Gap in Capital Budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5&6), pages 603-626.
    12. Glen C. Arnold & Panos D. Hatzopoulos, 2000. "The Theory‐Practice Gap in Capital Budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5‐6), pages 603-626, June.
    13. Shveta Singh & P.K. Jain & Surendra S. Yadav, 2012. "Capital budgeting decisions: evidence from India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 96-112, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siziba, Simiso & Hall, John Henry, 2021. "The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    2. Sureka, Riya & Kumar, Satish & Colombage, Sisira & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2022. "Five decades of research on capital budgeting – A systematic review and future research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Lefley, Frank, 1997. "Approaches to risk and uncertainty in the appraisal of new technology capital projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 21-33, November.
    4. Ravi Jagannathan & Iwan Meier & Vefa Tarhan, 2011. "The Cross-Section of Hurdle Rates for Capital Budgeting: An Empirical Analysis of Survey Data," NBER Working Papers 16770, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Lefley, Frank, 1996. "The payback method of investment appraisal: A review and synthesis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 207-224, July.
    6. Stephen Decanio, 1994. "Agency and Control Problems in US Corporations: The Case of Energy-efficient Investment Projects," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 105-124.
    7. Peter Markovič & Michal Šinský, 2009. "Trends in application of capital budgeting methods for investment projects evaluation," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(1).
    8. Chittenden, Francis & Derregia, Mohsen, 2015. "Uncertainty, irreversibility and the use of ‘rules of thumb’ in capital budgeting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 225-236.
    9. Mehari Mekonnen Akalu, 2002. "Evaluating the Capacity of Standard Investment Appraisal Methods," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-082/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Harris, Milton & Raviv, Artur, 1998. "Capital budgeting and delegation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 259-289, December.
    11. Andor, Gyorgy & Mohanty, Sunil K. & Toth, Tamas, 2015. "Capital budgeting practices: A survey of Central and Eastern European firms," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 148-172.
    12. Mark Freeman & Garry Hobbes, 1991. "Costly Information, Informed Investors and the Use of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques," Working Paper Series 1, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    13. W. Jan Brzeski & Austin J. Jaffe & Stellan Lundstrom, 1993. "Institutional Real Estate Investment Practices: Swedish and United States Experiences," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 8(3), pages 293-324.
    14. Olivier Rousse, 2008. "On the bias of yield-based capital budgeting methods," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 7(9), pages 1-8.
    15. Marcin Pawlak & Dariusz Zarzecki, 2020. "Investment Appraisal Practice in the European Union Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 687-699.
    16. Gil Cohen & Joseph Yagil, 2010. "Sectorial differences in corporate financial behavior: an international survey," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 245-262.
    17. Freeman, Mark C., 2009. "The practice of estimating the term structure of discount rates," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 219-234.
    18. Juergen Bufka & Oliver Kemper & Dirk Schiereck, 2004. "A note on estimating the divisional cost of capital for diversified companies: an empirical evaluation of heuristic-based approaches," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 68-80.
    19. Nene Lartey Addico & Godfred Amewu & Anthony Owusu‐Ansah, 2022. "The use of investment decision techniques and tools in practice in a frontier market: Evidence from Ghana," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1748-1763, September.
    20. Ahmad N. H. Anabtawi, 2018. "The Extent of Using and Trusting Capital Budgeting Methods in Projects Appraisal in Palestinian Corporations," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 151-151, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:globus:v:15:y:2014:i:2:p:339-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.imi.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.