IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accted/v14y2005i4p411-426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The research assessment exercise 2001—insights and implications for accounting education research in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Catriona Paisey
  • Nicholas Paisey

Abstract

Following the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), details from the submissions of each institution were made available to the public for the first time via the Internet, thus facilitating a greater degree of scrutiny of the results than had hitherto been the case. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the literature on the publishing patterns of UK academics by examining the accounting education submissions to the RAE 2001. The paper begins by discussing the RAE process in the UK and the findings of prior literature on publication patterns within accounting research in the UK in order to contextualise the examination of the RAE submissions in accounting education. In particular, the dominance of refereed journals over other publication outlets, the increasing prevalence of co-authorship and the characteristics of publishing academics are examined. The paper then reports on the methods used to analyse accounting education research submitted to the RAE 2001 and discusses the main findings. The implications of these findings are discussed in the concluding section.

Suggested Citation

  • Catriona Paisey & Nicholas Paisey, 2005. "The research assessment exercise 2001—insights and implications for accounting education research in the UK," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 411-426.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:411-426
    DOI: 10.1080/06939280500347134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/06939280500347134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/06939280500347134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus J. Milne, 2002. "The construction of journal quality: no engagement detected," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 72-86, March.
    2. Claire Marston & Aishah Ayub, 2000. "Relationship between publications in selected journals and Research Assessment Exercise rankings in 1996 for UK accountancy departments," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 93-102.
    3. Catriona Paisey & Nicholas Paisey, 2004. "An analysis of accounting education research in accounting education: an international journal - 1992-2001," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 69-99.
    4. Rob Gray & James Guthrie & Lee Parker, 2002. "Rites of passage and the self‐immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 1-30, March.
    5. Joanne Locke & Alan Lowe, 2002. "Problematising the construction of journal quality: an engagement with the mainstream," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 45-71, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marriott, Neil & Stoner, Greg & Fogarty, Tim & Sangster, Alan, 2014. "Publishing characteristics, geographic dispersion and research traditions of recent international accounting education research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 264-280.
    2. Huang, Haijie & Lee, Edward & Lyu, Changjiang & Zhu, Zhenmei, 2016. "The effect of accounting academics in the boardroom on the value relevance of financial reporting information," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 18-30.
    3. Peter Walton, 2008. "European Accounting Research -- A Comment," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hussain, Simon, 2010. "Accounting journals and the ABS quality ratings," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 1-16.
    2. M. R. Mathews, 2007. "Publish or Perish: Is this Really a Viable Set of Options?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 225-240.
    3. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem & Steve Uytbergen, 2008. "A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 61-90, October.
    4. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2006. "Constructing an ‘efficient frontier’ of accounting journal quality," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-341.
    5. Marriott, Neil & Stoner, Greg & Fogarty, Tim & Sangster, Alan, 2014. "Publishing characteristics, geographic dispersion and research traditions of recent international accounting education research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 264-280.
    6. Wade D. Cook & Tal Raviv & Alan J. Richardson, 2010. "Aggregating Incomplete Lists of Journal Rankings: An Application to Academic Accounting Journals," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3), pages 217-235, September.
    7. Williams, Paul F. & Jenkins, J. Gregory & Ingraham, Laura, 2006. "The winnowing away of behavioral accounting research in the US: The process for anointing academic elites," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 783-818, November.
    8. McPhail, Ken & Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Class, social deprivation and accounting education in Scottish schools: Implications for the reproduction of the accounting profession and practice," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 31-50.
    9. Dixon, Keith, 2013. "Growth and dispersion of accounting research about New Zealand before and during a National Research Assessment Exercise: Five decades of academic journals bibliometrics," MPRA Paper 51100, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Binh Bui & Hien Hoang & Duc P. T. Phan & P. W. Senarath Yapa, 2017. "Governance and compliance in accounting education in Vietnam – case of a public university," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 265-290, May.
    11. Brian Rutherford, 2010. "The social scientific turn in UK financial accounting research: A philosophical and sociological analysis," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 149-171.
    12. Parker, Lee D., 2012. "Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 54-70.
    13. Tucker, Basil P. & Lawson, Raef, 2020. "EMBAs perceived usefulness of academic research for student learning and use in practice," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    14. Gray, Rob & Perks, Bob, 2018. "Reflections on some of the formative years of the British Accounting Review: Thoughts of ducklings and swans," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(6), pages 580-587.
    15. Giuseppe Nicolo’ & Francesca Manes-Rossi & Johan Christiaens & Natalia Aversano, 2020. "Accountability through intellectual capital disclosure in Italian Universities," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(4), pages 1055-1087, December.
    16. Lin Mei Tan & Fawzi Laswad, 2018. "Professional skills required of accountants: what do job advertisements tell us?," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 403-432, July.
    17. Parker, Lee, 2011. "University corporatisation: Driving redefinition," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 434-450.
    18. Lowe, Alan & Locke, Joanne, 2005. "Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 81-98, January.
    19. Tucker, Basil P. & Tilt, Carol A., 2019. "‘You know it when you see it’: In search of ‘the ideal’ research culture in university accounting faculties," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Christopher Humphrey, 2005. "'In the aftermath of crisis: Reflections on the principles, values and significance of academic inquiry in accounting': Introduction," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 341-351.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:411-426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.