IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v34y2004i3p215-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further evidence on the roots of public sector operational (value-for-money) auditing: a response to Flesher and Zarzeski

Author

Listed:
  • Warwick Funnell

Abstract

Flesher and Zarzeski in their recent examination of the North American origins of value-for-money auditing highlight the reluctance of public sector auditors in Australia, New Zealand and Britain to assume operational auditing as part of their mandate until the 1970s, and then only gradually. It is suggested here that the very different constitutional forms of Westminster and American governments and their associated conventions denied auditors-general the authority to follow the American example. In their paper Flesher and Zarzeski also recognize Canada as an unusually early adopter of operational auditing, although suggesting that actual practices owed little to direct borrowings from the US. Canada was also the primary influence on the form taken by value-for-money auditing in other Westminster countries. It is suggested here that the decision by Canada in the early 1960s to recruit auditors-general from the private sector accelerated the transfer of value-for-money auditing to the public sector as did the admiration of Canadian auditors-general for the work of the GAO, even though they were constitutionally constrained in the extent of their borrowings.

Suggested Citation

  • Warwick Funnell, 2004. "Further evidence on the roots of public sector operational (value-for-money) auditing: a response to Flesher and Zarzeski," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 215-222.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:34:y:2004:i:3:p:215-222
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2004.9729965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729965
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dale Flesher & Marilyn Zarzeski, 2002. "The roots of operational (value-for-money) auditing in English-speaking nations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 93-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gendron, Yves & Cooper, David J. & Townley, Barbara, 2007. "The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 101-129.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clinton Free & Vaughan S. Radcliffe & Crawford Spence & Mitchell J. Stein, 2020. "Auditing and the Development of the Modern State," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 485-513, March.
    2. Gendron, Yves & Cooper, David J. & Townley, Barbara, 2007. "The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 101-129.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:34:y:2004:i:3:p:215-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.