IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v8y2021i3p193-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The efficiency evaluation of public procurement of medical equipment

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Gavurova

    (Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Czech Republic)

  • Matus Kubak

    (Technical University of Košice, Slovakia)

Abstract

At present, the health systems of many countries face complex challenges even if their priority objectives remain the same - to provide sustainable health systems at the current and the prognostic demographic changes and requirements in a health system. The quality and the efficiency of healthcare delivery and their mutual conformity have been brought to public attention. Similarly, the quality and the efficiency of an entire process depends on the instrumentation and its procurement that represents a significant economic and procedural issue in the healthcare systems for a long time. Many reports of the public procurement processes and research studies declare this fact. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the public procurement efficiency in the health system by means of the valuation approach, or savings’ estimates that are achieved by the public procurement. The savings were defined as a percentage difference between the estimated and the final contract price. The secondary objective is to examine an influence of selected variables on a creation of savings in the public procurement process by means of a regression analysis. The researched variables are as follows: time, method, procurement, NUTS level of procurement, Common Procurement Vocabulary Code, number of offers. The analysis results showed interesting findings. The number of offers has a significantly positive impact on the savings. It means that if the number of offers increases by one unit, the savings will increase by 15.6%. Also, time variable (year) has a positive impact on the savings. Consequently, it may be assumed that the public procurement process is improving from a time perspective. It may be partially caused by the fact that a new public procurement legislative has been valid since 2015. The NUTS level has also an impact on the savings in relation to the public procurement. The public procurements which took place at the level of a state were more beneficial as the public procurements at the regional level. Also, the procurement method was statistically significant parameter of a regression analysis. The competition actions together with a negotiation process created higher savings in comparison to tenders. In case of the CPV codes, the most significant savings were achieved in the group of ‘various medicinal products’. The study’s results provide a valuable knowledge for the creators of policies and a realization of the national strategic plans within the health system. Also, these results support a creation of national and international benchmarks in this area and a networking of international partnerships in the area of a public procurement that focus on a development of methodologies and comparative platforms creation.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Gavurova & Matus Kubak, 2021. "The efficiency evaluation of public procurement of medical equipment," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 193-209, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:193-209
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3(11)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/31/Gavurova_The_efficiency_evaluation_of_public_procurement_of_medical_equipment.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/775
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2021.8.3(11)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grega Matus & Orviska Marta & Nemec Juraj & Lawson Colin, 2019. "Factors Determining the Efficiency of Slovak Public Procurement," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 43-68, June.
    2. Beata Kiselova Bilekova & Beata Gavurova & Vladimír Rogalewicz, 2018. "Application of the HTA Core Model for complex evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of Radium-223 treatment in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Juraj Nemec & Matúš Grega & Mária Horehájová & Matúš Kubák, 2020. "Efficiency of Public Procurement in the Slovak Health Care [Efektívnosť verejného obstarávania v slovenskom zdravotníctve]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(1), pages 27-39.
    4. Coviello, Decio & Mariniello, Mario, 2014. "Publicity requirements in public procurement: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 76-100.
    5. Silvia Megyesiova & Vanda Lieskovska, 2018. "Analysis of the Sustainable Development Indicators in the OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Paweł Prędkiewicz & Agnieszka Bem & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż & Rafał Siedlecki, 2019. "Public or Private? Which Source of Financing Helps to Achieve Higher Health System Efficiency?," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Krzysztof Jajuga & Hermann Locarek-Junge & Lucjan T. Orłowski & Karsten Staehr (ed.), Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance, pages 191-199, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Balaeva & Yuliya Rodionova & Andrei Yakovlev & Andrey Tkachenko, 2022. "Public Procurement Efficiency as Perceived by Market Participants: The Case of Russia," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(16), pages 1156-1167, December.
    2. Beata Gavurova & Kristina Kocisova, 2020. "The efficiency of hospitals: platform for sustainable health care system," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 133-146, December.
    3. Beata Gavurova & Jan Dvorsky & Boris Popesko, 2021. "Patient Satisfaction Determinants of Inpatient Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Fazekas,Mihály & Blum,Jurgen Rene, 2021. "Improving Public Procurement Outcomes : Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9690, The World Bank.
    5. Erica Bosio & Simeon Djankov & Edward Glaeser & Andrei Shleifer, 2022. "Public Procurement in Law and Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(4), pages 1091-1117, April.
    6. Harouna Sedgo & Luc Désiré Omgba, 2023. "Corruption and distortion of public expenditures: evidence from Africa," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(2), pages 419-452, April.
    7. Emma Galli & Ilde Rizzo & Carla Scaglioni, 2018. "Transparency and Performance in the Italian Large Municipalities," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2-3), pages 5-25.
    8. Rodrigo Carril & Andres Gonzalez-Lira & Michael S. Walker, 2022. "Competition under Incomplete Contracts and the Design of Procurement Policies," Working Papers 1327, Barcelona School of Economics.
    9. Claudia Allende & Juan Pablo Atal & Rodrigo Carril & Jose Ignacio Cuesta & Andrés González Lira, 2023. "Drivers of public procurement prices: Evidence from pharmaceutical markets," Economics Working Papers 1874, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Silvia Megyesiova & Vanda Lieskovska, 2019. "Premature Mortality for Chronic Diseases in the EU Member States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Titl, Vitezslav & De Witte, Kristof & Geys, Benny, 2021. "Political donations, public procurement and government efficiency," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    12. Georgia Kosmopoulou & Carlos Lamarche & Xueqi Zhou, 2016. "Price Adjustment Policies And Firm Size," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 895-906, April.
    13. Seres, G. & Pigon, Adam, 2019. "On the Competitive Effects of Screening in Procurement," Other publications TiSEM 3314c398-ea79-4f74-96f4-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Gavurova Beata & Cepel Martin & Belas Jaroslav & Dvorsky Jan, 2020. "Strategic Management in SMEs and Its Significance for Enhancing the Competitiveness in the V4 Countries - A Comparative Analysis," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(4), pages 557-569, December.
    15. Matus Kubak & Peter Nemec & Robert Stefko & Marcel Volosin, 2023. "On competition and transparency in public procurement during the COVID-19 pandemic in the European Union," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(2), pages 4-23, June.
    16. Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth & Fazekas, Mihály, 2020. "Anti-corruption in aid-funded procurement: Is corruption reduced or merely displaced?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Decio Coviello & Andrea Guglielmo & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2015. "The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance," CEIS Research Paper 361, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 17 Nov 2015.
    18. Michael Klien & Michael Böheim & Matthias Firgo & Andreas Reinstaller & Peter Reschenhofer & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2021. "Stärkung der Unabhängigkeit des Wirtschaftsstandortes Österreich bei kritischen Produkten," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 67234.
    19. Barbosa, Klenio & Boyer, Pierre C., 2021. "Discrimination in Dynamic Procurement Design with Learning-by-doing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    20. Titl, Vitezslav & Geys, Benny, 2019. "Political donations and the allocation of public procurement contracts," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 443-458.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    public procurement; public procurement efficiency; medical equipment; patients’ satisfaction; public procurement efficiency determinants; savings;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D20 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - General
    • H32 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Firm

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:193-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.