IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v10y2022i2p333-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of scientific research on audit quality reporting in the global economic context

Author

Listed:
  • Marioara Molociniuc (Hritcan)

    (Stefan cel Mare University, Romania)

  • Anatol Melega

    (Stefan cel Mare University, Romania)

  • Maria Grosu

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Romania)

  • Mihaela Tulvinschi

    (Stefan cel Mare University, Romania)

  • Anamaria Geanina Macovei

    (Stefan cel Mare University, Romania)

Abstract

The development of the economy and the capital markets has led to substantial changes over time, both in terms of audit reporting and determining the quality of the audit. The primary purpose of the present study is to conduct an empirical evaluation of the most relevant scientific publications, which target the topic of quality of reporting in audit, determining the dominant factors for quality assurance in auditing, as well as future research directions, both for other potential researchers and us. The study proposes a bibliometric analysis of the main articles encountered in SCOPUS and Web of Science databases, aiming to choose a sample of data to perform a meta-analysis. The obtained results certify that the audit report is the fundamental element in restoring the quality of the audit, followed by education, regulations and legislative changes and last but not least, by the steps taken by the audit team in carrying out missions to assure investment efficiency and to provide credibility for investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Marioara Molociniuc (Hritcan) & Anatol Melega & Maria Grosu & Mihaela Tulvinschi & Anamaria Geanina Macovei, 2022. "Evolution of scientific research on audit quality reporting in the global economic context," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 10(2), pages 333-350, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:333-350
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2022.10.2(20)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/38/Molociniuc(Hritcan)_Evolution_of_scientific_research_on_audit_quality_reporting_in_the_global_economic_context.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1028
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2022.10.2(20)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauren C. Reid & Joseph V. Carcello & Chan Li & Terry L. Neal & Jere R. Francis, 2019. "Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 1501-1539, September.
    2. Ralf Ewert & Alfred Wagenhofer, 2019. "Effects of Increasing Enforcement on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 121-168, March.
    3. Krishnan, Gopal V. & Tanyi, Paul, 2020. "Does Regulating Audit Pricing Enhance Audit Quality and the Timeliness of Audit Reporting? The Texas Experience," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 5(1), pages 1-64, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Dong & Li, Yi & Lu, Jiani & Li, Chenming, 2024. "Do international tax treaties govern financial report quality?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Weiwei Gao & Ting Cao & Zhen Huang, 2021. "Do outsiders listen to insiders? The role of government support in market reactions to earnings announcements," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 781-795, June.
    3. Ma, Jin & Coram, Paul & Troshani, Indrit, 2024. "The effect of key audit matters and management disclosures on auditors’ judgements and decisions: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    4. Zhang, Chanyuan (Abigail) & Cho, Soohyun & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2022. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Tarek Abdelfattah & Mohamed Elmahgoub & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2021. "Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 177-197, November.
    6. Alrowwad, Anas Mohammad & Alhasanat, Khaled Ahmad & Sokil, Oleh & Halko, Serhii & Kucherkova, Svitlana, 2022. "Sustainable transformation of accounting in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.
    7. Li, Valerie & Luo, Yan, 2023. "Costs and benefits of auditors' disclosure of critical audit matters: Initial evidence from the United States," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    8. Nien-Su Shih, 2024. "Does Using the Extended Audit Report Decrease Information Asymmetry in Family Firms?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 1-3.
    9. Hien Hoang & Robyn Moroney & Soon‐Yeow Phang & Xinning Xiao, 2023. "Investor reactions to key audit matters: Financial and non‐financial contexts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3325-3349, September.
    10. Nan, Lin & Tang, Chao & Zhang, Gaoqing, 2024. "Whistleblowing bounties and informational effects," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1).
    11. Elsayed, Mohamed & Elshandidy, Tamer & Ahmed, Yousry, 2023. "Is expanded auditor reporting meaningful? UK evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    12. Markus Widmann & Florian Follert & Matthias Wolz, 2021. "What is it going to cost? Empirical evidence from a systematic literature review of audit fee determinants," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 455-489, April.
    13. Lin, Hsiao-Lun & Yen, Ai-Ru, 2022. "Auditor rotation, key audit matter disclosures, and financial reporting quality," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Jochen Bigus & Florian Dreyer, 2023. "Country‐level Accounting Enforcement and IPO Underpricing," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(3), pages 735-775, September.
    15. Kong, Dongmin & Ji, Mianmian & Liu, Shasha, 2022. "Does the mandatory disclosure of audit information affect analysts' information acquisition?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    16. Shao-Huai Liang & Yu-Ting Hsieh & Hsuan-Chu Lin & Hui-Yu Hsiao, 2023. "What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1243-1258, April.
    17. Ma, Qianqun & Zhou, Jianan & Wang, Qi & Wang, Kongwen, 2024. "The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Zhai, Huayun & Lu, Meiting & Shan, Yaowen & Liu, Qingzhuo & Zhao, Ying, 2021. "Key audit matters and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    19. Michael Kend & Lan Anh Nguyen, 2020. "Big Data Analytics and Other Emerging Technologies: The Impact on the Australian Audit and Assurance Profession," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 30(4), pages 269-282, December.
    20. Schantl, Stefan F. & Wagenhofer, Alfred, 2020. "Deterrence of financial misreporting when public and private enforcement strategically interact," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quality in audit; bibliometric analysis; meta-analysis; audit report;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:333-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.