IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/fininv/v9y2020i3f9_3_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Earning Management: An Empirical Study of Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Christos N. Christodoulou-Volos

Abstract

This empirical study aims to reveal that companies conduct earnings management by the fuzzy zone of allowance policy. It investigates the interrelationship between the allowance for doubtful accounts and earning management with the use of three hypotheses. The data used are from Chinese listed companies for the period 2008- 2017. The Chinese accounting standards have experienced two major changes and because of that, this study is divided into two parts. After the modification of 2014, the allowance for doubtful accounts and the reversal faced a huge difference comparing with previous rules. The findings prove that before 2014, Chinese listed companies manipulated the earnings with the help of allowance for doubtful accounts. However, afterwards the possibility of earning management deteriorates, showing the effectiveness of the fair value accounting standard improvement. Furthermore, return on equity shows less significant relationship with allowance for doubtful accounts. Although a previous study considers debt contracts enhances the negative relationship with allowance for doubtful accounts, the findings show instead a positive one. This simply means that high leverage ratio creates higher allowance for doubtful accounts. JEL classification numbers: G28, M41, C20. Keywords: Earning Management; Allowance for Doubtful Accounts; Regression Analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Christos N. Christodoulou-Volos, 2020. "Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Earning Management: An Empirical Study of Chinese Listed Companies," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:fininv:v:9:y:2020:i:3:f:9_3_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JFIA%2fVol%209_3_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott B. Jackson & Xiaotao (Kelvin) Liu, 2010. "The Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts, Conservatism, and Earnings Management," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 565-601, June.
    2. McNichols, Maureen F., 2000. "Research design issues in earnings management studies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(4-5), pages 313-345.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pinto, Inês, 2013. "Asset value management in the Portuguese real estate sector," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 86-97.
    2. Araceli Mora Enguidanos & Juan Manuel García Lara & Beatriz García Osma & Ana Gisbert Clemente, 2004. "La Comparabilidad De La Información Contable En Europa: Efectos De La Manipulación Contable Sobre El Nivel De Conservadurismo," Working Papers. Serie EC 2004-14, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    3. S. Verbruggen & J. Christiaens, 2010. "Earnings Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Does Governmental Financing Play a Role?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 10/665, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    4. Anastasia A. Zakolyukina, 2018. "How Common Are Intentional GAAP Violations? Estimates from a Dynamic Model," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 5-44, March.
    5. Trimble, Madeline, 2018. "A reinvestigation into accounting quality following global IFRS adoption: Evidence via earnings distributions," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 18-39.
    6. Silva, Aldy Fernandes da & Weffort, Elionor Farah Jreige & Flores, Eduardo da Silva & Silva, Glauco Peres da, 2014. "Gerenciamento de resultados e crises econômicas no mercado de capitais brasileiro," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 54(3), May.
    7. Timothy A. Seidel & Chad A. Simon & Nathaniel M. Stephens, 2020. "Management bias across multiple accounting estimates," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-53, March.
    8. Bornemann, Sven & Kick, Thomas & Memmel, Christoph & Pfingsten, Andreas, 2012. "Are banks using hidden reserves to beat earnings benchmarks? Evidence from Germany," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2403-2415.
    9. Hibbert, Ann Marie & Kang, Qiang & Kumar, Alok & Mishra, Suchi, 2020. "Heterogeneous beliefs and return volatility around seasoned equity offerings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 571-589.
    10. Pamela Kent & James Routledge & Jenny Stewart, 2010. "Innate and discretionary accruals quality and corporate governance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(1), pages 171-195, March.
    11. Muhammad Ilyas, Ihtesham Khan, Saima Urooge, 2019. "Earnings Manipulation and the Cost of Capital: Empirical Investigation of Non-Financial Listed Firms of Pakistan," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 6(1), pages 96-104, March.
    12. Graham, Roger C. & Moore, Jared A., 2018. "The mitigation of high-growth-related accounting distortions after sarbanes-oxley," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 82-94.
    13. Chyz, James A. & Eulerich, Marc & Fligge, Benjamin & Romney, Miles A., 2023. "Codetermination and aggressive reporting: Audit committee employee representation, tax aggressiveness, and earnings management," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Ruch, George W. & Taylor, Gary, 2015. "Accounting conservatism: A review of the literature," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 17-38.
    15. Sarah B. Stuber & Chris E. Hogan, 2021. "Do PCAOB Inspections Improve the Accuracy of Accounting Estimates?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 331-370, March.
    16. Xiangyu Chen & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Dang Khoa Tran & Waseem Alhaddad & Jinsoo Hwang & Phung Anh Thu, 2020. "Are Socially Responsible Companies Really Ethical? The Moderating Role of State-Owned Enterprises: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Theoharry Grammatikos & Nikolaos I. Papanikolaou, 2021. "Applying Benford’s Law to Detect Accounting Data Manipulation in the Banking Industry," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 59(1), pages 115-142, April.
    18. James Jianxin Gong & S. Mark Young & Aner Zhou, 2023. "Real earnings management and the strategic release of new products: evidence from the motion picture industry," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1209-1249, September.
    19. Mohamed Khalil & Aydin Ozkan, 2016. "Board Independence, Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Egypt," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 15(1), pages 84-118, April.
    20. Blankley, Alan I. & Hong, Keejae P. & Kerr, David & Wiggins, Casper E., 2014. "A note on the effect of PCAOB inspections on the audit quality of triennial CPA firms," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 212-216.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    earning management; allowance for doubtful accounts; regression analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • C20 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:fininv:v:9:y:2020:i:3:f:9_3_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.