IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v37y2023i6d10.1007_s11269-022-03233-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Climate change and local anthropogenic activities have altered river flow regimes across Canterbury, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Doug J. Booker

    (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research)

  • Ton H. Snelder

    (LWP Ltd. Christchurch)

Abstract

River flow regimes influence ecologic, cultural, social, aesthetic, and economic values. Detecting changes in river flows and attributing their causes is important but challenging due to the combined influence of climate and relevant local activities, and the lack of data on water abstraction, drainage modification or land use management. This study assessed the degree to which trends in river flows could be attributed to changes in climate versus local anthropogenic activities across Canterbury, Aotearoa New Zealand. Trends were assessed for a period that started immediately after a change in regulatory regime in 1991 and ended in 2020, that coincided with increases in water abstraction and changes in water management practices. Trends in observed summer conditions indicated that rainfall was stable, temperature increased, and flows decreased for many sites during the assessed period. Models representing flow as a function of rainfall and temperature were trained and tested using cross-validation for an earlier baseline period. Predictions for the 1991–2020 period made with the models were used to account for the effect of change in climate. The difference between predicted and observed flows were attributed to changes in local activities. Decreases in summer flows were partially associated with changes in climate, but changes in summer flows in several catchments were also associated with local activities. The findings indicate changes to both climate and local activities have combined to alter flow regimes, suggesting that hydrological impacts of local activities should be considered alongside climate change when making river flow management decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Doug J. Booker & Ton H. Snelder, 2023. "Climate change and local anthropogenic activities have altered river flow regimes across Canterbury, New Zealand," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(6), pages 2657-2674, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03233-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03233-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-022-03233-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-022-03233-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Mastrandrea & Katharine Mach, 2011. "Treatment of uncertainties in IPCC Assessment Reports: past approaches and considerations for the Fifth Assessment Report," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 659-673, October.
    2. Anderson, E. P. & Jackson, S. & Tharme, R. E. & Douglas, M. & Flotemersch, J. E. & Zwarteveen, M. & Lokgariwar, C. & Montoya, M. & Wali, A. & Tipa, G. T. & Jardine, T. D. & Olden, J. D. & Cheng, L. & , 2019. "Understanding rivers and their social relations: a critical step to advance environmental water management," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 6(6):1-21..
    3. Dench, William E. & Morgan, Leanne K., 2021. "Unintended consequences to groundwater from improved irrigation efficiency: Lessons from the Hinds-Rangitata Plain, New Zealand," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Duncan, M.J. & Srinivasan, M.S. & McMillan, H., 2016. "Field measurement of groundwater recharge under irrigation in Canterbury, New Zealand, using drainage lysimeters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen J. Déry & Marco A. Hernández-Henríquez & Tricia A. Stadnyk & Tara J. Troy, 2021. "Vanishing weekly hydropeaking cycles in American and Canadian rivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Buchs, Arnaud & Calvo-Mendieta, Iratxe & Petit, Olivier & Roman, Philippe, 2021. "Challenging the ecological economics of water: Social and political perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I.-Yun Chen & Chih-Hung Tseng & Yueh-Shiu Lee & Jao-Chuan Lin, 2022. "A Study of the Impact of River Improvement and Greening on Public Reassurance and the Urban Well-Being Index during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-28, March.
    4. M. Babaei & H. Ketabchi, 2022. "Determining Groundwater Recharge Rate with a Distributed Model and Remote Sensing Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(14), pages 5401-5423, November.
    5. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Wang, Jiaxin & He, Xinlin & Gong, Ping & Heng, Tong & Zhao, Danqi & Wang, Chunxia & Chen, Quan & Wei, Jie & Lin, Ping & Yang, Guang, 2024. "Response of fragrant pear quality and water productivity to lateral depth and irrigation amount," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Graham, Scott L. & Kochendorfer, John & McMillan, Andrew M.S. & Duncan, Maurice J. & Srinivasan, M.S. & Hertzog, Gladys, 2016. "Effects of agricultural management on measurements, prediction, and partitioning of evapotranspiration in irrigated grasslands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 340-347.
    8. Dench, William E. & Morgan, Leanne K., 2021. "Unintended consequences to groundwater from improved irrigation efficiency: Lessons from the Hinds-Rangitata Plain, New Zealand," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Chen, Xiuzhi & Liu, Chang & van Oel, Pieter & Mergia Mekonnen, Mesfin & Thorp, Kelly R. & Yin, Tuo & Wang, Jinyan & Muhammad, Tahir & Li, Yunkai, 2022. "Water and carbon risks within hydropower development on national scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    10. Scott Janzwood, 2020. "Confident, likely, or both? The implementation of the uncertainty language framework in IPCC special reports," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1655-1675, October.
    11. Lina Yousry & Yixin Cao & Bruno Marmiroli & Olivier Guerri & Guillaume Delaunay & Olivier Riquet & Karl Matthias Wantzen, 2022. "A Socio-Ecological Approach to Conserve and Manage Riverscapes in Designated Areas: Cases of the Loire River Valley and Dordogne Basin, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-38, December.
    12. André Golgher & Marcos Callisto & Robert Hughes, 2023. "Improved Ecosystem Services and Environmental Gentrification after Rehabilitating Brazilian Urban Streams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Aiping Pang & Fen Zhao & Chunhui Li & Yujun Yi, 2021. "Rethinking Environmental Flows for the Yellow River Estuary by Trading Off Crop Yield and Ecological Benefits," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Kari De Pryck, 2021. "Controversial Practices: Tracing the Proceduralization of the IPCC in Time and Space," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S7), pages 80-89, December.
    15. Penny, Jessica & Ordens, Carlos M. & Barnett, Steve & Djordjević, Slobodan & Chen, Albert S., 2023. "Small-scale land use change modelling using transient groundwater levels and salinities as driving factors – An example from a sub-catchment of Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    16. Graham, Scott L. & Laubach, Johannes & Hunt, John E. & Eger, Andre & Carrick, Sam & Whitehead, David, 2019. "Predicting soil water balance for irrigated and non-irrigated lucerne on stony, alluvial soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    17. Casey Helgeson & Richard Bradley & Brian Hill, 2018. "Combining probability with qualitative degree-of-certainty metrics in assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 517-525, August.
    18. S. Ferguson & D. Berteaux & A. Gaston & J. Higdon & N. Lecomte & N. Lunn & M. Mallory & J. Reist & D. Russell & N. Yoccoz & X. Zhu, 2012. "Time series data for Canadian arctic vertebrates: IPY contributions to science, management, and policy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 235-258, November.
    19. Lund, A.A. Rehman & Gates, Timothy K. & Scalia, Joseph, 2023. "Characterization and control of irrigation canal seepage losses: A review and perspective focused on field data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    20. Leandra Merz & Di Yang & Vanessa Hull, 2020. "A Metacoupling Framework for Exploring Transboundary Watershed Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:37:y:2023:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-022-03233-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.