IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v30y2016i13d10.1007_s11269-016-1491-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review

Author

Listed:
  • C. Dieperink

    (Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development)

  • D. L. T Hegger

    (Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development)

  • M. H. N. Bakker

    (Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development)

  • Z. W. Kundzewicz

    (Institute of Agricultural and Forest Environment
    Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research)

  • C. Green

    (Middlesex University, Flood Hazard Research Centre)

  • P. P. J. Driessen

    (Utrecht University, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development)

Abstract

In Europe increasing flood risks challenge societies to diversify their Flood Risk Management Strategies (FRMSs). Such a diversification implies that actors not only focus on flood defence, but also and simultaneously on flood risk prevention, mitigation, preparation and recovery. There is much literature on the implementation of specific strategies and measures as well as on flood risk governance more generally. What is lacking, though, is a clear overview of the complex set of governance challenges which may result from a diversification and alignment of FRM strategies. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap. It elaborates on potential processes and mechanisms for coordinating the activities and capacities of actors that are involved on different levels and in different sectors of flood risk governance, both concerning the implementation of individual strategies and the coordination of the overall set of strategies. It identifies eight overall coordination mechanisms that have proven to be useful in this respect.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Dieperink & D. L. T Hegger & M. H. N. Bakker & Z. W. Kundzewicz & C. Green & P. P. J. Driessen, 2016. "Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4467-4481, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:30:y:2016:i:13:d:10.1007_s11269-016-1491-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dik Roth & Jeroen Warner, 2007. "Flood Risk, Uncertainty And Changing River Protection Policy In The Netherlands: The Case Of ‘Calamity Polders’," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(4), pages 519-525, September.
    2. Willem Oosterberg & Camiel Van Drimmelen & Maarten Van der Vlist, 2005. "Strategies to harmonize urbanization and flood risk management in deltas," ERSA conference papers ersa05p174, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Carel Dieperink & Rene Boesten & Jeroen Hovens & Henrieke Tonkes, 2012. "Sustainable coastal development and open planning? Transferring the integrated area approach to Bulgaria," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(1), pages 58-70, January.
    4. Howard Kunreuther & Mark Pauly, 2006. "Rules rather than discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 101-116, September.
    5. Howard Kunreuther & Mark Pauly, 2006. "Rules Rather Than Discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina," NBER Working Papers 12503, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Lena Partzsch & Rafael Ziegler, 2011. "Social entrepreneurs as change agents: a case study on power and authority in the water sector," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 63-83, March.
    7. Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell & Sally Priest & Clare Johnson, 2014. "The evolution of UK flood insurance: incremental change over six decades," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 694-713, December.
    8. Kalliopi Sapountzaki & Sylvia Wanczura & Gabriella Casertano & Stefan Greiving & Gavriil Xanthopoulos & Floriana Ferrara, 2011. "Disconnected policies and actors and the missing role of spatial planning throughout the risk management cycle," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(3), pages 1445-1474, December.
    9. Dries Hegger & Peter Driessen & Carel Dieperink & Mark Wiering & G. Raadgever & Helena Rijswick, 2014. "Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(12), pages 4127-4142, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sang Ug Kim & Cheol-Eung Lee, 2021. "Incorporation of Cost-Benefit Analysis Considering Epistemic Uncertainty for Calculating the Optimal Design Flood," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(2), pages 757-774, January.
    2. Eline Punt & Jochen Monstadt & Sybille Frank & Patrick Witte, 2023. "Beyond the dikes: an institutional perspective on governing flood resilience at the Port of Rotterdam," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 230-248, June.
    3. Chaowei Xu & Hao Fu & Jiashuai Yang & Lingyue Wang, 2022. "Assessment of the Relationship between Land Use and Flood Risk Based on a Coupled Hydrological–Hydraulic Model: A Case Study of Zhaojue River Basin in Southwestern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Song-Yue Yang & Bing-Chen Jhong & You-Da Jhong & Tsung-Tang Tsai & Chang-Shian Chen, 2023. "Long short-term memory integrating moving average method for flood inundation depth forecasting based on observed data in urban area," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 2339-2361, March.
    5. Li Li & Eun-Sung Chung & Kyung Soo Jun, 2018. "Robust Parameter Set Selection for a Hydrodynamic Model Based on Multi-Site Calibration Using Multi-Objective Optimization and Minimax Regret Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(12), pages 3979-3995, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Raschky, 2007. "Estimating the effects of risk transfer mechanisms against floods in Europe and U.S.A.: A dynamic panel approach," Working Papers 2007-05, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    2. Mario Jametti & Thomas von Ungern-Sternberg, 2009. "Hurricane Insurance in Florida," Quaderni della facoltà di Scienze economiche dell'Università di Lugano 0905, USI Università della Svizzera italiana.
    3. Yasuyuki Sawada, 2017. "Disasters, Household Decisions, and Insurance Mechanisms: A Review of Evidence and a Case Study from a Developing Country in Asia," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 12(1), pages 18-40, January.
    4. Riyanti Djalante & Cameron Holley & Frank Thomalla & Michelle Carnegie, 2013. "Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 2105-2135, December.
    5. Craig E. Landry & Dylan Turner & Daniel Petrolia, 2021. "Flood Insurance Market Penetration and Expectations of Disaster Assistance," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(2), pages 357-386, June.
    6. Wang, Chunhua, 2014. "Regulating land development in a natural disaster-prone area: The roles of building codes," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 209-228.
    7. Timo R. Lambregts & Paul Bruggen & Han Bleichrodt, 2021. "Insurance decisions under nonperformance risk and ambiguity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 229-253, December.
    8. Marielle Brunette & Laure Cabantous & Stéphane Couture & Anne Stenger, 2009. "Assurance, intervention publique et ambiguïté : une étude expérimentale auprès de propriétaires forestiers privés," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 190(4), pages 123-134.
    9. Osberghaus, Daniel & Reif, Christiane, 2021. "How do different compensation schemes and loss experience affect insurance decisions? Experimental evidence from two independent and heterogeneous samples," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Ji Yun Lee & Fangjiao Ma & Yue Li, 2022. "Understanding homeowner proactive actions for managing wildfire risks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1525-1547, November.
    11. SAWADA Yasuyuki & MASAKI Tatsujiro & NAKATA Hiroyuki & SEKIGUCHI Kunio, 2017. "Natural Disasters: Financial preparedness of corporate Japan," Discussion papers 17014, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    12. Vitale, Corinne & Meijerink, Sander & Moccia, Francesco Domenico & Ache, Peter, 2020. "Urban flood resilience, a discursive-institutional analysis of planning practices in the Metropolitan City of Milan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Antonio Coviello & Giovanni Di Trapani, 2013. "Supply Risk Management: Mitigation Strategy," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 3(1), pages 169-176, December.
    14. Dobes Leo & Jotzo Frank & Stern David I., 2014. "The Economics of Global Climate Change: A Historical Literature Review," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 65(3), pages 281-320, December.
    15. Evan Flugman & Pallab Mozumder & Timothy Randhir, 2012. "Facilitating adaptation to global climate change: perspectives from experts and decision makers serving the Florida Keys," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 1015-1035, June.
    16. Wang, Chen & Sun, Jiayi & Russell, Roddy & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2018. "Analyzing willingness to improve the resilience of New York City's transportation system," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 10-19.
    17. Paul A. Raschky & Manijeh Schwindt, 2016. "Aid, Catastrophes and the Samaritan's Dilemma," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(332), pages 624-645, October.
    18. Howard C. Kunreuther & Erwann O. Michel-Kerjan, 2007. "Evaluating The Effectiveness of Terrorism Risk Financing Solutions," NBER Working Papers 13359, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. T. Ermolieva & T. Filatova & Y. Ermoliev & M. Obersteiner & K. M. de Bruijn & A. Jeuken, 2017. "Flood Catastrophe Model for Designing Optimal Flood Insurance Program: Estimating Location‐Specific Premiums in the Netherlands," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 82-98, January.
    20. Sungyoon Lee & Jennifer Dodge & Gang Chen, 2022. "The cost of social vulnerability: an integrative conceptual framework and model for assessing financial risks in natural disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 691-712, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:30:y:2016:i:13:d:10.1007_s11269-016-1491-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.