IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v29y2015i2p233-251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systems Approach to Understanding the Evolution of the Agro-Social-Ecological System of the Upper Rio Grande-San Luis Valley, Colorado

Author

Listed:
  • K. Mix
  • V. Lopes
  • W. Rast

Abstract

Understanding the complex dynamics of social-ecological systems (SES) is difficult because rigorous methodologies and methods for this purpose are lacking. Multi-scale (temporal and geographical) linkages and pathways can mask feedbacks. Thus, understanding SES requires multi-dimensional analyses. This study presents a potential methodology and method for multi-dimensional analyses of a SES in the Upper Rio Grande-San Luis Valley (URG-SLV), Colorado. A driver identification process identified 5 major drivers in the URG-SLV, including stream flow, climate, agriculture, and endogenous and exogenous policy. Several of these drivers possessed more than one longitude. Data for these drivers begins as early as 1852 and extends to 2007. Changes in driver longitudes (long-term datasets within a single driver; maximum, minimum and mean annual temperature comprise climate longitudes) were detected via change point analysis, occurring at several transitional points. Linkages were defined using known relationships between drivers (e.g., stream flow and water rights). Cross-scale relationships between the URG-SLV and downstream users through policy changes and climate also presented a temporal cross-scale linkage. Using the relationships and cross-scale linkages, a historical evolution of the system was constructed throughout the 150-plus years of record to illustrate the effects of changes in drivers and cross-scale linkages in the system. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • K. Mix & V. Lopes & W. Rast, 2015. "A Systems Approach to Understanding the Evolution of the Agro-Social-Ecological System of the Upper Rio Grande-San Luis Valley, Colorado," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(2), pages 233-251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:29:y:2015:i:2:p:233-251
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0735-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-014-0735-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-014-0735-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agrawal, Arun, 2001. "Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(10), pages 1649-1672, October.
    2. P. J. Greig & P. G. Devonshire, 1981. "Tree Removals And Saline Seepage In Victorian Catchments: Some Hydrologic And Economic Results," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 25(2), pages 134-148, August.
    3. Anderies, John M., 2006. "Robustness, institutions, and large-scale change in social-ecological systems: the Hohokam of the Phoenix Basin," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 133-155, August.
    4. Greig, P.J. & Devonshire, P.G., 1981. "Tree Removals And Saline Seepage In Victorian Catchments: Some Hydrologic And Economic Results," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 25(2), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Urama, Kevin C. & Hodge, Ian D., 2006. "Are stated preferences convergent with revealed preferences? Empirical evidence from Nigeria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 24-37, August.
    2. Young, Ralph, 1991. "The Economic Significance of Environmental Resources: A Review of the Evidence," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(03), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Tisdell, Clement A., 1985. "Conserving and Planting Trees on Farms: Lessons from Australian Cases," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(03), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Quiggin, John C., 1986. "Common Property, Private Property And Regulation The Case Of Dryland Salinity," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 30(2-3), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Ian D. Hodge, 1982. "Rights To Cleared Land And The Control Of Dryland‐Seepage Salinity," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(3), pages 185-201, December.
    6. Rose, Roger & Cox, Anthony, 1991. "Australia's natural resources: optimising present and future use," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316171, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    7. Sinden, Jack A. & Jones, A.D., 1985. "Eucalypt Dieback And Stocking Rates In Southern New England, New South Wales," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 29(2), pages 1-8, August.
    8. Purnamita Dasgupta, 2007. "Common Property Resources as Development Drivers: A Study of Fruit Cooperative in Himachal Pradesh: India," Working Papers id:917, eSocialSciences.
    9. Maryati, Sri & Firman, Tommy & Humaira, An Nisaa Siti, 2022. "A sustainability assessment of decentralized water supply systems in Bandung City, Indonesia," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Arts, Bas & de Koning, Jessica, 2017. "Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 315-325.
    11. Boscow Okumu & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2017. "Determinants of Successful Collective Management of Forest Resources: Evidence from Kenyan Community Forest Associations," Working Papers 698, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    12. Chervier, Colas & Le Velly, Gwenolé & Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss, 2019. "When the Implementation of Payments for Biodiversity Conservation Leads to Motivation Crowding-out: A Case Study From the Cardamoms Forests, Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 499-510.
    13. Dinesh Dhakal & David O’Brien & Peter Mueser, 2021. "Government Policy and Performance of Agricultural Cooperatives: A Case Study in Chitwan District, Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Schultz, Bill, 2020. "Resource management and joint-planning in fragmented societies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Fabio Silva & Fiona Coward & Kimberley Davies & Sarah Elliott & Emma Jenkins & Adrian C. Newton & Philip Riris & Marc Vander Linden & Jennifer Bates & Elena Cantarello & Daniel A. Contreras & Stefani , 2022. "Developing Transdisciplinary Approaches to Sustainability Challenges: The Need to Model Socio-Environmental Systems in the Longue Durée," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Yujun Sun & Khambay KHAMPHILAVONG, 2013. "People’s Participation in the Production Forest Management in the Middle Part of Lao," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 2(12), pages 22-29, December.
    17. D. G. Webster & Semra A. Aytur & Mark Axelrod & Robyn S. Wilson & Joseph A. Hamm & Linda Sayed & Amber L. Pearson & Pedro Henrique C. Torres & Alero Akporiaye & Oran Young, 2022. "Learning from the Past: Pandemics and the Governance Treadmill," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    18. Song, Andrew, 2018. "Reconstructing Governability: How Fisheries Are Made Governable," MarXiv zavwc, Center for Open Science.
    19. Li, Jiaxin & Wang, Zihan & Cheng, Xin & Shuai, Jing & Shuai, Chuanmin & Liu, Jing, 2020. "Has solar PV achieved the national poverty alleviation goals? Empirical evidence from the performances of 52 villages in rural China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    20. Quaranta Giovanni & Salvia Rosanna, 2014. "An Index to Measure Rural Diversity in the Light of Rural Resilience and Rural Development Debate," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 161-178, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:29:y:2015:i:2:p:233-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.