IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v28y2014i6p1713-1732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Two Different Approaches to Modelling Management and Operation Rules in a Single River System Model

Author

Listed:
  • Dushmanta Dutta
  • Jie Chen
  • Dave Penton
  • Matthew Bethune
  • Wendy Welsh
  • Shaun Kim
  • Tony Sheedy
  • Alistair Korn

Abstract

Different water agencies use different modeling tools for water resources planning and management. For example, different jurisdictions in Australia use a variety of river system models and these models vary considerably in approach and assumptions, including different time steps (monthly and daily), flow routing (different types of routing and no routing), ordering solution (optimization and heuristic) and representation of management and operational rules. These fundamental differences in approach make it difficult to integrate existing models of connected river systems at a basin scale. A collaborative joint venture (the eWater CRC) between research, industry and government partners has recently developed an integrated river system modelling tool called “eWater Source” to improve on the existing river system models in Australia. One of the major advances in Source is the implementation of two decision algorithms, heuristic and NetLP approaches, for water distribution modelling in the same modelling platform. This paper describes the implementation of heuristic and NetLP approaches for water delivery under management and operations rules in Source, and compares the performance of the two approaches through a case study in the Goulburn-Broken-Campaspe-Loddon (GBCL) river system in south-eastern Australia. The key performance measures used to compare the approaches include the efficiency and equity of water delivery to water users, impacts on the reliability of supply, agreement with storage operating targets, and model application run time. The results demonstrate that the heuristic approach implemented in Source can replicate the performance of the NetLP approach for a model of reasonable complexity. This is important because the run times of models with heuristic approaches are shorter than models with NetLP approaches, so this will allow more complexity to be represented than was previously practical in equivalent NetLP applications. Agreement between jurisdictions to move to the single river system modelling platform will contribute to overcoming the problems faced by river managers in Australia in transboundary river basins. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Dushmanta Dutta & Jie Chen & Dave Penton & Matthew Bethune & Wendy Welsh & Shaun Kim & Tony Sheedy & Alistair Korn, 2014. "Examining Two Different Approaches to Modelling Management and Operation Rules in a Single River System Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(6), pages 1713-1732, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:6:p:1713-1732
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-014-0583-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11269-014-0583-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-014-0583-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro, J. & Nabona, N., 1996. "An implementation of linear and nonlinear multicommodity network flows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 37-53, July.
    2. Vedula, S. & Mujumdar, P.P. & Chandra Sekhar, G., 2005. "Conjunctive use modeling for multicrop irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 193-221, May.
    3. Deepti Rani & Maria Moreira, 2010. "Simulation–Optimization Modeling: A Survey and Potential Application in Reservoir Systems Operation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(6), pages 1107-1138, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behrang Beiranvand & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Optimization of Dams Reservoir Operation Using the Meta-heuristic Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(9), pages 3457-3526, July.
    2. D. Morankar & K. Srinivasa Raju & D. Nagesh Kumar, 2013. "Integrated Sustainable Irrigation Planning with Multiobjective Fuzzy Optimization Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(11), pages 3981-4004, September.
    3. Feng, Zhong-kai & Niu, Wen-jing & Wang, Wen-chuan & Zhou, Jian-zhong & Cheng, Chun-tian, 2019. "A mixed integer linear programming model for unit commitment of thermal plants with peak shaving operation aspect in regional power grid lack of flexible hydropower energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 618-629.
    4. Xinyu Wu & Yuan Lei & Chuntian Cheng & Qilin Ying, 2023. "An Optimal Operation Method for Parallel Hydropower Systems Combining Reservoir Level Control and Power Distribution," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(4), pages 1729-1745, March.
    5. Garg, N.K. & Dadhich, Sushmita M., 2014. "Integrated non-linear model for optimal cropping pattern and irrigation scheduling under deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    6. T. Fowe & I. Nouiri & B. Ibrahim & H. Karambiri & J. Paturel, 2015. "OPTIWAM: An Intelligent Tool for Optimizing Irrigation Water Management in Coupled Reservoir–Groundwater Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(10), pages 3841-3861, August.
    7. Zhang, Dongmei & Guo, Ping, 2016. "Integrated agriculture water management optimization model for water saving potential analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 5-19.
    8. Fi-John Chang & Yu-Chung Wang & Wen-Ping Tsai, 2016. "Modelling Intelligent Water Resources Allocation for Multi-users," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(4), pages 1395-1413, March.
    9. Frederick Chou & Hao-Chih Lee & William Yeh, 2013. "Effectiveness and Efficiency of Scheduling Regional Water Resources Projects," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(3), pages 665-693, February.
    10. Mijangos, E., 2005. "An efficient method for nonlinearly constrained networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(3), pages 618-635, March.
    11. Mojtaba Moravej & Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari, 2016. "Large Scale Reservoirs System Operation Optimization: the Interior Search Algorithm (ISA) Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3389-3407, August.
    12. M. Tabari & Jaber Soltani, 2013. "Multi-Objective Optimal Model for Conjunctive Use Management Using SGAs and NSGA-II Models," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(1), pages 37-53, January.
    13. Yang, Gaiqiang & Guo, Ping & Huo, Lijuan & Ren, Chongfeng, 2015. "Optimization of the irrigation water resources for Shijin irrigation district in north China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 82-98.
    14. D. Haro & J. Paredes & A. Solera & J. Andreu, 2012. "A Model for Solving the Optimal Water Allocation Problem in River Basins with Network Flow Programming When Introducing Non-Linearities," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(14), pages 4059-4071, November.
    15. Jure Margeta & Zvonimir Glasnovic, 2011. "Hybrid RES-HEP Systems Development," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(9), pages 2219-2239, July.
    16. Lihua Chen & Jing Yu & Jin Teng & Hang Chen & Xiang Teng & Xuefang Li, 2022. "Optimizing Joint Flood Control Operating Charts for Multi–reservoir System Based on Multi–group Piecewise Linear Function," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3305-3325, July.
    17. V. Jothiprakash & R. Arunkumar, 2013. "Optimization of Hydropower Reservoir Using Evolutionary Algorithms Coupled with Chaos," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 1963-1979, May.
    18. Zhong-kai Feng & Wen-jing Niu & Zhi-qiang Jiang & Hui Qin & Zhen-guo Song, 2020. "Monthly Operation Optimization of Cascade Hydropower Reservoirs with Dynamic Programming and Latin Hypercube Sampling for Dimensionality Reduction," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(6), pages 2029-2041, April.
    19. Liping Li & Pan Liu & David Rheinheimer & Chao Deng & Yanlai Zhou, 2014. "Identifying Explicit Formulation of Operating Rules for Multi-Reservoir Systems Using Genetic Programming," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(6), pages 1545-1565, April.
    20. Evangelos Rozos, 2019. "Machine Learning, Urban Water Resources Management and Operating Policy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:28:y:2014:i:6:p:1713-1732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.