IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v35y2022i2d10.1007_s11213-021-09565-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embedding Design Thinking Paradigm in a University’s Business Assistance to Small Business

Author

Listed:
  • Afred Suci

    (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology
    Universitas Lancang Kuning)

  • Sri Maryanti

    (Universitas Lancang Kuning)

  • Hardi Hardi

    (Universitas Lancang Kuning)

  • Nining Sudiar

    (Universitas Lancang Kuning)

Abstract

Interest gaps exist between the university and the small firms when running a business assistance program, leading to the importance of practical guidance that could accommodate both partners’ interests. However, there is relatively little literature about how the university team should implement business assistance to a small partnering firm. Accordingly, this research used three stages and a mixed-method approach to solve the problem, involving qualitative and quantitative techniques and action research. This study introduced PROSEM, an acronym for problem rooting, solution treatment, and measurement, to guide university business assistance to small firms by adopting the design thinking paradigm. The results revealed a significant impact on the SME’s business performance. The PROSEM process further proved that a measurable and well-planned treatment based on the root causes could increase revenue and production volume and reduce the returned product rate. At the same time, this study enriches researchers’ knowledge and skills in developing the concept and guidelines of a systematic problem-solving method using unique, real cases in the small business community. As such, the PROSEM affirms that design thinking is an open and adjustable concept which can be embedded and modified in various problem-solving procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Afred Suci & Sri Maryanti & Hardi Hardi & Nining Sudiar, 2022. "Embedding Design Thinking Paradigm in a University’s Business Assistance to Small Business," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 177-201, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09565-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-021-09565-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-021-09565-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-021-09565-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ankrah, Samuel & AL-Tabbaa, Omar, 2015. "Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 387-408.
    2. Tulus Tambunan, 2007. "Entrepreneurship Development: Smes In Indonesia," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(01), pages 95-118.
    3. Grimm, Michael & Paffhausen, Anna Luisa, 2015. "Do interventions targeted at micro-entrepreneurs and small and medium-sized firms create jobs? A systematic review of the evidence for low and middle income countries," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 67-85.
    4. Sahar Saeed Rezk & Shahinaz Gamal, 2020. "An Organizational Cybernetics Framework for Designing a Viable Higher Education System," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 703-724, December.
    5. Ian Gordon & Eleanor Hamilton & Sarah Jack, 2012. "A study of a university-led entrepreneurship education programme for small business owner/managers," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9-10), pages 767-805, December.
    6. Kevin F Mole & Mark Hart & Stephen Roper & David S Saal, 2011. "Broader or Deeper? Exploring the Most Effective Intervention Profile for Public Small Business Support," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(1), pages 87-105, January.
    7. Erica Mazzola & Manfredi Bruccoleri & Giovanni Perrone, 2012. "The Effect Of Inbound, Outbound And Coupled Innovation On Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-27.
    8. Richard Thorpe & Jason Cope & Monder Ram & Mike Pedler, 2009. "Leadership development in small- and medium-sized enterprises: the case for action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 201-208, November.
    9. Johan Lambrecht & Fabrice Pirnay, 2005. "An evaluation of public support measures for private external consultancies to SMEs in the Walloon Region of Belgium," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 89-108, March.
    10. Taran Thune, 2007. "University-industry collaboration: The network embeddedness approach," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 158-168, April.
    11. Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Kuan-Yi Wu, 2018. "Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Jean-Claude Boldrini & Guy Caverot & Maxime Ezequel, 2017. "The journey in Open Innovation to develop a SME: A longitudinal case study in a French robotics company," Working Papers halshs-01502720, HAL.
    13. Andrew Davies, 2004. "Moving base into high-value integrated solutions: a value stream approach," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(5), pages 727-756, October.
    14. RUSU Valentina Diana & ROMAN Angela, 2016. "The Impact Of Macroeconomic Conditions On Smes Performance In Terms Of Employment," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 142-159, December.
    15. Jin Hong & Jinfeng Lu, 2016. "Assessing the effectiveness of business incubators in fostering SMEs: evidence from China," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1/2), pages 45-60.
    16. Tulus Tambunan, 2008. "SME development, economic growth, and government intervention in a developing country: The Indonesian story," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 147-167, December.
    17. Janusz Stal & Grażyna Paliwoda-Pękosz, 2019. "Fostering development of soft skills in ICT curricula: a case of a transition economy," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 250-274, April.
    18. Khairul Akmaliah Adham & Nur Sa’adah Muhamad & Mohd Fuaad Said & Shahrizin Abdul Sarhadat & Habib Asaril Ismail & Mohd Fareez Assrul Mohd Nasir, 2019. "Diagnosing Business Incubation for Social Purpose: A Viable System Model Approach," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 219-238, April.
    19. Oswald Jones & Allan Macpherson & Richard Thorpe, 2010. "Learning in owner-managed small firms: Mediating artefacts and strategic space," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7-8), pages 649-673, November.
    20. Colin Wren, 2002. "Evaluating the effect of soft business support upon small firm performance," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 334-365, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joan-Lluis Capelleras & Ignacio Contín-Pilart & Martin Larraza-Kintana, 2011. "Publicly Funded Prestart Support for New Firms: Who Demands it and How it Affects Their Employment Growth," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 821-847, October.
    2. Norin Arshed & Sara Carter & Colin Mason, 2014. "The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 639-659, October.
    3. Rhiannon Pugh & Danny Soetanto & Sarah L. Jack & Eleanor Hamilton, 2021. "Developing local entrepreneurial ecosystems through integrated learning initiatives: the Lancaster case," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 833-847, February.
    4. Kevin Mole & Joan-Lluís Capelleras, 2018. "Take-up and variation of advice for new firm founders in different local contexts," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 3-27, February.
    5. Capelleras, Joan-Lluis & Mole, Kevin F., 2012. "How ‘buzz’ reduces uncertainty for new firm founders," MPRA Paper 38170, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    7. Kevin F Mole & George Bramley, 2006. "Making Policy Choices in Nonfinancial Business Support: An International Comparison," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 885-908, December.
    8. Uwe Cantner & Martin Kalthaus & Indira Yarullina, 2024. "Outcomes of science-industry collaboration: factors and interdependencies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 542-580, April.
    9. Fredrik Sjöholm & Nannan Lundin, 2010. "The Role of Small Firms in the Technology Development of China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1117-1139, September.
    10. Greene, Francis, 2012. "Should the focus of publicly provided small business assistance be on start-ups or growth businesses?," Occasional Papers 12/2, Ministry of Economic Development, New Zealand.
    11. Norin Arshed & Colin Mason & Sara Carter, 2016. "Exploring the disconnect in policy implementation: A case of enterprise policy in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1582-1611, December.
    12. Kevin Mole & David North & Robert Baldock, 2017. "Which SMEs seek external support? Business characteristics, management behaviour and external influences in a contingency approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(3), pages 476-499, May.
    13. Kevin Mole & Mark Hart & Stephen Roper & David Saal, 2008. "Differential Gains from Business Link Support and Advice: A Treatment Effects Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(2), pages 315-334, April.
    14. Andrés Barge-Gil & Aurelia Modrego, 2011. "The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 61-83, February.
    15. David Higgins & Kelly Smith & Mohammed Mirza, 2013. "Entrepreneurial Education: Reflexive Approaches to Entrepreneurial Learning in Practice," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 22(2), pages 135-160, September.
    16. Laura Ramaciotti & Alessandro Muscio & Ugo Rizzo, 2017. "The impact of hard and soft policy measures on new technology-based firms," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 629-642, April.
    17. Kevin Mole & Robert Baldock & David North, 2013. "Who Takes Advice? Firm Size Threshold, Competence, Concerns and Informality in a Contingency Approach," Research Papers 0009, Enterprise Research Centre.
    18. Adegbile, Abiodun Samuel & Sarpong, David & Kolade, Oluwaseun, 2021. "Environments for Joint University-Industry Laboratories (JUIL): Micro-level dimensions and research implications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Marius Băban & Călin Florin Băban & Tudor Mitran, 2023. "Universities as an External Knowledge Source for Industry: Investigating the Antecedents’ Impact on the Importance Perception of Their Collaboration in Open Innovation Using an Ordinal Regression-Neur," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Nuno Gil & Marcela Miozzo, 2007. "Innovation in Private Infrastructure Development Effects of the Selection Environment and Modularity," DRUID Working Papers 07-23, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09565-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.