IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v58y2017i2d10.1007_s00362-015-0706-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On a mixed model analysis of multi-environment variety trials: a reconsideration of the one-stage and the two-stage models and analyses

Author

Listed:
  • T. Caliński

    (Poznań University of Life Sciences)

  • S. Czajka

    (Poznań University of Life Sciences)

  • Z. Kaczmarek

    (Polish Academy of Sciences)

  • P. Krajewski

    (Polish Academy of Sciences)

  • W. Pilarczyk

    (Poznań University of Life Sciences)

  • I. Siatkowski

    (Poznań University of Life Sciences)

  • M. Siatkowski

    (Poznań University of Life Sciences)

Abstract

Of interest is the analysis of results of a series of experiments conducted at several environments with the same set of plant varieties (called multi-environment variety trials). The most common practice is first to analyze individual trials and then to perform a kind of “synthesis” of the results obtained. This is considered as a two-stage approach to the analysis of the trial data. More recently a combined analysis of the raw plot data from all trials taken simultaneously has been advocated, as a one-stage approach to the analysis. The purpose of this article is to reconsider these two approaches with regard to the underlying models and the analyses based on them. The indicated differences between them are illustrated by a thorough analysis of a set of data from a series of trials with rye varieties. The required computations have been accomplished with the use of R.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Caliński & S. Czajka & Z. Kaczmarek & P. Krajewski & W. Pilarczyk & I. Siatkowski & M. Siatkowski, 2017. "On a mixed model analysis of multi-environment variety trials: a reconsideration of the one-stage and the two-stage models and analyses," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 433-465, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-015-0706-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-015-0706-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-015-0706-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-015-0706-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Caliński & S. Czajka & Z. Kaczmarek & P. Krajewski & W. Pilarczyk, 2005. "Analyzing Multi-environment Variety Trials Using Randomization-Derived Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 448-455, June.
    2. Rao, C. Radhakrishna, 1973. "Representations of best linear unbiased estimators in the Gauss-Markoff model with a singular dispersion matrix," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 276-292, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nesrin Güler & Melek Eriş Büyükkaya & Melike Yiğit, 2022. "Comparison of Covariance Matrices of Predictors in Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models," Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 801-809, September.
    2. Stephen Haslett & Simo Puntanen, 2011. "On the equality of the BLUPs under two linear mixed models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 381-395, November.
    3. Harry Haupt & Walter Oberhofer, 2002. "Fully restricted linear regression: A pedagogical note," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7.
    4. Haupt, Harry & Oberhofer, Walter, 2006. "Best affine unbiased representations of the fully restricted general Gauss-Markov model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 759-764, March.
    5. Guang Jing Song & Qing Wen Wang, 2014. "On the weighted least-squares, the ordinary least-squares and the best linear unbiased estimators under a restricted growth curve model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 375-392, May.
    6. Yongge Tian & Jieping Zhang, 2011. "Some equalities for estimations of partial coefficients under a general linear regression model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 911-920, November.
    7. Changli Lu & Yuqin Sun & Yongge Tian, 2013. "On relations between weighted least-squares estimators of parametric functions under a general partitioned linear model and its small models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(5), pages 707-722, July.
    8. S. J. Haslett & X. Q. Liu & A. Markiewicz & S. Puntanen, 2020. "Some properties of linear sufficiency and the BLUPs in the linear mixed model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 385-401, February.
    9. Huang, Yunying & Zheng, Bing, 2015. "The additive and block decompositions about the WLSEs of parametric functions for a multiple partitioned linear regression model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 123-135.
    10. Ren, Xingwei, 2014. "On the equivalence of the BLUEs under a general linear model and its restricted and stochastically restricted models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Yongge Tian & Wenxing Guo, 2016. "On comparison of dispersion matrices of estimators under a constrained linear model," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 25(4), pages 623-649, November.
    12. Yongge Tian, 2017. "Transformation approaches of linear random-effects models," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 26(4), pages 583-608, November.
    13. Bo Jiang & Yuqin Sun, 2019. "On the equality of estimators under a general partitioned linear model with parameter restrictions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 273-292, February.
    14. Y. Tian, 2017. "Some equalities and inequalities for covariance matrices of estimators under linear model," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 467-484, June.
    15. T. Caliński & S. Czajka & Z. Kaczmarek & P. Krajewski & W. Pilarczyk, 2009. "A mixed model analysis of variance for multi-environment variety trials," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 735-759, August.
    16. Lu, Changli & Gan, Shengjun & Tian, Yongge, 2015. "Some remarks on general linear model with new regressors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 16-24.
    17. Alan J. Rogers, 2013. "Concentration Ellipsoids, Their Planes of Support, and the Linear Regression Model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 220-243, February.
    18. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2002:i:1:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. He, Daojiang & Wu, Jie, 2014. "Admissible linear estimators of multivariate regression coefficient with respect to an inequality constraint under matrix balanced loss function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 37-43.
    20. Groß, Jürgen & Trenkler, Götz, 1998. "The equality between linear transforms of ordinary least squares and best linear unbiased estimator," Technical Reports 1998,14, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    21. Tian, Yongge & Jiang, Bo, 2016. "Equalities for estimators of partial parameters under linear model with restrictions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 299-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-015-0706-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.