IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v32y2023i2d10.1007_s10260-022-00667-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multilevel structured latent curve model for disaggregating student and school contributions to learning

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel McNeish

    (Arizona State University)

  • Jeffrey R. Harring

    (University of Maryland)

  • Denis Dumas

    (University of Denver)

Abstract

Educational researchers continue to debate the relative contribution of individual and environmental factors to learning. Concomitant with the proliferation of longitudinal educational testing following students and schools over time, recent research has shown that nonlinear mixed effect models can be parameterized to directly estimate quantities meaningful to learning processes and are situated to address questions about whether learning is driven by the individuals or the context. However, three-level nonlinear models pose estimation challenges because the likelihood does not have a closed-form solution and integral approximations are intractable when there are multiple random effects at multiple levels of the model. Multivariate reparameterization to a structured latent curve model has been suggested as a method to circumvent similar issues in two-level models, but the approach has not yet to be extended to the context of three-level models. We extend the idea of structured latent curve models to accommodate data with a three-level hierarchy. We apply the model to six years of mathematics and reading scores from 6346 students in 68 schools to partition the variance of learning parameters into school- and student-level components. The results show that—compared to reading—learning in mathematics is more heavily influenced by school-level factors and that there is evidence for stronger Matthew effects (“the rich get richer”) in mathematics than in reading.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel McNeish & Jeffrey R. Harring & Denis Dumas, 2023. "A multilevel structured latent curve model for disaggregating student and school contributions to learning," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(2), pages 545-575, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:32:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10260-022-00667-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-022-00667-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-022-00667-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-022-00667-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabella Sulis & Mariano Porcu, 2015. "Assessing Divergences in Mathematics and Reading Achievement in Italian Primary Schools: A Proposal of Adjusted Indicators of School Effectiveness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 607-634, June.
    2. George Leckie, 2009. "The complexity of school and neighbourhood effects and movements of pupils on school differences in models of educational achievement," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(3), pages 537-554, June.
    3. Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene & Sibillot, Solenne & Proust, Cecile & Molina, Jean-Michel & Thiebaut, Rodolphe, 2007. "Robustness of the linear mixed model to misspecified error distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(10), pages 5142-5154, June.
    4. Verbeke, Geert & Lesaffre, Emmanuel, 1997. "The effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution in linear mixed models for longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 541-556, February.
    5. Daowen Zhang & Marie Davidian, 2001. "Linear Mixed Models with Flexible Distributions of Random Effects for Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 795-802, September.
    6. Larry V. Hedges & E. C. Hedberg, 2013. "Intraclass Correlations and Covariate Outcome Correlations for Planning Two- and Three-Level Cluster-Randomized Experiments in Education," Evaluation Review, , vol. 37(6), pages 445-489, December.
    7. Casey Codd & Robert Cudeck, 2014. "Nonlinear Random-Effects Mixture Models for Repeated Measures," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 60-83, January.
    8. Emmanuel Lesaffre & Bart Spiessens, 2001. "On the effect of the number of quadrature points in a logistic random effects model: an example," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 50(3), pages 325-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Warrington Nicole M. & Tilling Kate & Howe Laura D. & Paternoster Lavinia & Pennell Craig E. & Wu Yan Yan & Briollais Laurent, 2014. "Robustness of the linear mixed effects model to error distribution assumptions and the consequences for genome-wide association studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(5), pages 567-587, October.
    2. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2015. "Specification of random effects in multilevel models: a review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 967-976, May.
    3. Vock, David & Davidian, Marie & Tsiatis, Anastasios, 2014. "SNP_NLMM: A SAS Macro to Implement a Flexible Random Effects Density for Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 56(c02).
    4. Peng Zhang & Peter X.-K. Song & Annie Qu & Tom Greene, 2008. "Efficient Estimation for Patient-Specific Rates of Disease Progression Using Nonnormal Linear Mixed Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 29-38, March.
    5. Ye, Rendao & Wang, Tonghui & Gupta, Arjun K., 2014. "Distribution of matrix quadratic forms under skew-normal settings," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 229-239.
    6. Francis K. C. Hui & Samuel Müller & Alan H. Welsh, 2021. "Random Effects Misspecification Can Have Severe Consequences for Random Effects Inference in Linear Mixed Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 186-206, April.
    7. Jacqmin-Gadda, Helene & Sibillot, Solenne & Proust, Cecile & Molina, Jean-Michel & Thiebaut, Rodolphe, 2007. "Robustness of the linear mixed model to misspecified error distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(10), pages 5142-5154, June.
    8. Li, Erning & Pourahmadi, Mohsen, 2013. "An alternative REML estimation of covariance matrices in linear mixed models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(4), pages 1071-1077.
    9. Jara, Alejandro & Quintana, Fernando & San Marti­n, Ernesto, 2008. "Linear mixed models with skew-elliptical distributions: A Bayesian approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(11), pages 5033-5045, July.
    10. Reyhaneh Rikhtehgaran & Iraj Kazemi, 2013. "Semi-parametric Bayesian estimation of mixed-effects models using the multivariate skew-normal distribution," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 2007-2027, October.
    11. Rendao Ye & Tonghui Wang & Saowanit Sukparungsee & Arjun Gupta, 2015. "Tests in variance components models under skew-normal settings," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(7), pages 885-904, October.
    12. Weiping Zhang & MengMeng Zhang & Yu Chen, 2020. "A Copula-Based GLMM Model for Multivariate Longitudinal Data with Mixed-Types of Responses," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 353-379, November.
    13. Loy, Adam & Hofmann, Heike, 2014. "HLMdiag: A Suite of Diagnostics for Hierarchical Linear Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 56(i05).
    14. Xiao Song & Marie Davidian & Anastasios A. Tsiatis, 2002. "A Semiparametric Likelihood Approach to Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 742-753, December.
    15. Philip S. Boonstra & Bhramar Mukherjee & Jeremy M. G. Taylor & Mef Nilbert & Victor Moreno & Stephen B. Gruber, 2011. "Bayesian Modeling for Genetic Anticipation in Presence of Mutational Heterogeneity: A Case Study in Lynch Syndrome," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1627-1637, December.
    16. Bart Spiessens & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Geert Verbeke & KyungMann Kim, 2002. "Group Sequential Methods for an Ordinal Logistic Random-Effects Model Under Misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 569-575, September.
    17. Huang, Pei & McCarl, Bruce A., 2014. "Estimating Decadal Climate Variability Effects on Crop Yields: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169828, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Zeinolabedin Najafi & Karim Zare & Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi & Soheil Shokri & Amir Mosavi, 2022. "Inference and Local Influence Assessment in a Multifactor Skew-Normal Linear Mixed Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Wendimagegn Ghidey & Emmanuel Lesaffre & Paul Eilers, 2004. "Smooth Random Effects Distribution in a Linear Mixed Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(4), pages 945-953, December.
    20. Charles E. McCulloch & John M. Neuhaus, 2011. "Prediction of Random Effects in Linear and Generalized Linear Models under Model Misspecification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 270-279, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:32:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10260-022-00667-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.